Meat & poultrymoderate variability

Pork, chop, lean only eaten calories: 205 per 1 regular (120 g)

This exact USDA record reports 205 calories for 1 regular (120 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 regular · 120 g

Calories
205 kcal
Protein
33.6 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
Total fat
7.1 g
Fiber
0 g
Sodium
427 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 regular · 120 g

205calories

Pork, chop, lean only eaten

Protein
33.6 g
Carbs
0 g
Fat
7.1 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2705868

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 205 calories for 1 regular at 120 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 171 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 33.6 g protein, 0 g fiber, and 427 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, cooked, broiled, representing 69.6% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 regular at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 29–308 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2705868: “Pork, chop, lean only eaten.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2705868, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 cubic inch” through “1 thick” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 cubic inchUSDA-listed household measure 17 g 29 kcal 4.8 g 0 g 61 mg
1 regularUSDA-listed household measure 120 g 205 kcal 33.6 g 0 g 427 mg
1 thickUSDA-listed household measure 180 g 308 kcal 50.4 g 0 g 641 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Pork

The comparison set contains 21 exact records in the Pork USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2705868’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

171 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
236 kcal
Middle 50%
208–271 kcal

Based on 21 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

28 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
26 g
Middle 50%
24.6–26.7 g

Based on 21 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

0 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0 g
Middle 50%
0–0 g

Based on 21 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

356 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
395 mg
Middle 50%
353–448 mg

Based on 21 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2705868’s 120 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Potassium; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Potassium524 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Magnesium32 mg

≈ 8% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium427 mg

≈ 19% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat2.4 g

≈ 12% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Pork, chop, lean only eaten,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2705871 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 cubic inch to 1 thick

    USDA assigns those measures 17 g and 180 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 29 kcal to 308 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2705871

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 7.2 g less carbohydrate than “Pork, chop, coated, lean only eaten.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, cooked, broiled

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, cooked, broiled supplies 69.6% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “chop; lean only eaten” fits. Inspect FDC 2705871 when “chop; coated; lean only eaten” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Pork, chop, lean only eaten

Exact source wording
“Pork, chop, lean only eaten”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705868 · FNDDS 22101020
Named qualifiers
chop · lean only eaten

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Pork, chop, coated, lean only eaten

Exact source wording
“Pork, chop, coated, lean only eaten”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705871 · FNDDS 22101320
Named qualifiers
chop · coated · lean only eaten
Source inputs unique in this pair
Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plain · Vegetable oil, NFS

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “chop” and “lean only eaten”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordPork, chop, lean only eaten 120 g205 kcal 171 kcal 28 g 5.9 g 0 g 356 mg
Pork, chop, coated, lean only eaten 120 g250 kcal 208 kcal 26 g 7.7 g 0.4 g 413 mg
Pork, chop, lean and fat eaten 120 g234 kcal 195 kcal 27 g 9.2 g 0 g 351 mg
Pork, steak, lean only eaten 120 g276 kcal 230 kcal 26.7 g 12.8 g 0 g 318 mg
Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten 120 g275 kcal 229 kcal 25.1 g 10.6 g 0.4 g 409 mg
Pork, steak, lean and fat eaten 120 g317 kcal 264 kcal 25.2 g 17.4 g 0 g 316 mg
Pork, roast 60 g109 kcal 181 kcal 26.6 g 7.5 g 0 g 353 mg

How to compare FDC 2705868: its source amount is 120 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2705868, the 6 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 thin

154 kcal

90 g

1 regular

205 kcal

120 g

1 thick

308 kcal

180 g

1 slice, any size

51 kcal

30 g

1 oz yields

34 kcal

20 g

1 cubic inch

29 kcal

17 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2705868, Cholesterol is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Cholesterol

85.2 mg≈ 28% Daily Value

Sodium

427.2 mg≈ 19% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2705868’s 120 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2705868 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 33.6 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2705868 at 120 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 427 mg sodium, about 19% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 120 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 205 kcal Not established
Protein 33.6 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 0 g 0%
Total fat 7.1 g 9%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0%
Sugars 0 g Not established
Sodium 427.2 mg 19%
Saturated fat 2.4 g 12%
Monounsaturated Fat 3 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.8 g Not established
Cholesterol 85.2 mg 28%
Potassium 524.4 mg 11%
Calcium 7.2 mg 1%
Iron 0.7 mg 4%
Magnesium 32.4 mg 8%
Vitamin C 0 mg 0%
Vitamin D 0.7 µg 4%
Vitamin A 0 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 76.9 g Not established

For FDC 2705868, approximate percentages divide the displayed 120 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2705868 to 3 source inputs totaling 100.6 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Pork, chop, lean only eaten” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, cooked, broiled, Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, with added solution, cooked, broiled, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.6 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, with added solution, cooked, broiledUSDA ingredient 10947 30 GM 30 g 29.8%
2 Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, cooked, broiledUSDA ingredient 10068 70 GM 70 g 69.6%
3 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.6 GM 0.6 g 0.6%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2705868, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Pork” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories171 kcal208 kcal−37 kcal
Protein28 g26 g+2 g
Carbohydrate0 g7.2 g−7.2 g
Total fat5.9 g7.7 g−1.8 g
Dietary fiber0 g0.4 g−0.4 g
Sodium356 mg413 mg−57 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 37 less calories, 7.2 g less carbohydrate, and 1.8 g less total fat than “Pork, chop, coated, lean only eaten.”

Only the comparison record lists Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plain; Vegetable oil, NFS. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

4 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, with added solution, cooked, broiled; Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean only, cooked, broiled; Salt, table.

Listed only in the comparison: Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plain; Vegetable oil, NFS.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 120 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular (120 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 120 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular (120 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2705868 with FDC 2705871 at equal mass; use their 120 g and 120 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2705868 versus FDC 2705871 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full pork source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2705868 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, cut and fat trim, cooking method, breading, marinade, or sauce.

For “Pork, chop, lean only eaten,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    cut and fat trim

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    breading, marinade, or sauce

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2705868 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 171 kcal per 100 g becomes 205 kcal at 120 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 regular has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2705868

FNDDS food code: 22101020

The scaling for FDC 2705868 can be exact while the match to “Pork, chop, lean only eaten” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 120 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.