USDA source topicMeat & poultry

USDA Pork records: median 236 calories per 100 g across 21 foods

Across 21 exact USDA Survey Foods records in this topic, median energy is 236 kcal per 100 grams and the central 80% runs from 171 kcal to 404 kcal. These are collection statistics, not a calorie estimate for a particular meal.

The complete collection preserves all 21 source descriptions, household measures, nutrient distributions, and FoodData Central citations so the summary can be checked against the underlying records.

Looking for serving calories?

Use the consumer meal guide

This page owns the complete USDA category dataset. The guide is designed to help you compare named servings and choose a close meal description.

Read the Pork guide →

Distribution at a glance

Where calorie density sits in this USDA record set

Percentiles summarize these 21 cited records; they are not a confidence interval or a prediction for one meal.

  1. 10th percentile 171 kcal
    171 kcal
  2. Median 236 kcal
    236 kcal
  3. 90th percentile 404 kcal
    404 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What is included?

The exact descriptions define the topic.

USDA places these records in the “Pork” survey-food category. Within Feast’s broader navigation, they appear under Meat & poultry (21 records). The category label is useful for discovery, but it does not mean every record uses the same recipe, brand, cooking method, or portion.

The current collection includes Pork, chop, lean only eaten; Pork, bones; Pork, belly; Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten; Barbecue pork, no sauce; Pork, ears. Those examples show why the exact wording matters. The complete alphabetical catalog farther down the page preserves all 21 descriptions instead of replacing them with one generic average.

A distribution view of the source set

Median and central nutrient ranges per 100 grams

The central range runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the 21 records on this page. It shows the middle of this finite source set without treating its endpoints as typical.

On smaller screens, focus a topic table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Median, central interval, and observed per-100-gram nutrient span for this USDA source topic
NutrientMedianCentral 80%Observed spanRecords
Caloriesper 100 g236 kcal171 kcal–404 kcal134 kcal–569 kcal21
Proteinper 100 g26 g16.2 g–28 g11.6 g–61.3 g21
Carbohydrateper 100 g0 g0 g–7.2 g0 g–12.1 g21
Total fatper 100 g15.1 g7.5 g–31.3 g3.4 g–41.7 g21
Dietary fiberper 100 g0 g0 g–0.4 g0 g–0.4 g21
Total sugarsper 100 g0 g0 g–0.6 g0 g–9.9 g21
Sodiumper 100 g395 mg339 mg–1,040 mg316 mg–1,820 mg21
Potassiumper 100 g328 mg126 mg–422 mg13 mg–462 mg21
Calciumper 100 g24 mg6 mg–41 mg0 mg–55 mg21
Ironper 100 g1 mg0.6 mg–1.7 mg0.3 mg–2.1 mg21

All rows use the same 100-gram denominator and values from the cited records. The interval is descriptive, not a recommended intake range or statistical confidence interval.

A comparatively wide central spread

Sodium: 395 mg calculated median

Among 21 “Pork” records, the central interval for sodium extends from 339 mg to 1,040 mg per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 316 mg to 1,820 mg.

10th percentile: Pork, tenderloin reports 339 mg, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: Pork, ham hocks reports 1,040 mg, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Total fat: 15.1 g calculated median

Among 21 “Pork” records, the central interval for total fat extends from 7.5 g to 31.3 g per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 3.4 g to 41.7 g.

10th percentile: Pork, roast reports 7.5 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: Pork skin rinds reports 31.3 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Carbohydrate: 0 g calculated median

Among 21 “Pork” records, the central interval for carbohydrate extends from 0 g to 7.2 g per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0 g to 12.1 g.

10th percentile: Barbecue pork, no sauce reports 0 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten reports 7.2 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

The three callouts above are the widest central spreads relative to each metric’s midpoint, with a minimum scale applied so near-zero medians do not dominate. The complete table remains the primary record of all ten metrics.

Preparation language in the records

Source descriptions reveal meaningful distinctions.

The counts below report words and phrases that appear explicitly in the 21 USDA descriptions. They can help narrow a search to a closer record. They do not prove that the named preparation caused a nutrient difference, because these survey-food records are not controlled experiments.

no sauce

1 record uses this wording, including Barbecue pork, no sauce.

roasted

1 record uses this wording, including Pork, roast.

Portion context

Household measures answer a different question than 100 grams.

21 of 21 records (100%) include at least one named measure in the source data. Together those records provide 81 usable named measures.

A cup, slice, piece, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can represent a different amount of food. Even two measures with the same label may have different gram weights across records. Open the closest profile and use its listed weight instead of transferring a measure from another record.

USDA’s representative source amount is also not necessarily what a visitor ate. For equal-weight comparison, use the 100-gram table. For meal estimation, match the exact description first, then match the amount, and finally account for additions or preparation details absent from the selected record.

Common named measures in this topic

Choosing a closer record

Use a sequence, not a guess disguised as precision.

  1. 01

    Match the exact description

    Look for the closest food name, preparation, additions, and context. “Pork” is the collection label; the individual description is the actual reference.

  2. 02

    Compare on equal weight

    Use the per-100-gram values when comparing two records. This keeps the denominator fixed and prevents different source-serving weights from masquerading as a food difference.

  3. 03

    Scale the closest listed measure

    Open the profile, select a named household measure when one fits, or enter a gram estimate. Treat scaled decimals as arithmetic from the source—not greater certainty about the plate.

  4. 04

    Add missing context

    Brand, recipe, cooking fat, sauce, toppings, substitutions, and edible portion can move the result. A current package label or weighed recipe may be more specific than a generic survey-food record.

From source topic to familiar meal

Meal guides fully represented inside this collection

Every linked record in these guides belongs to this exact USDA topic. The guide layer organizes recognizable meal families and variations while the collection below preserves the complete source catalog.

Complete source catalog

All 21 “Pork” records

Records are alphabetical, not ranked. Every row links to a Feast profile with household measures, the 21-nutrient Feast panel, estimate factors, methodology, and the exact USDA FoodData Central source where available.

Complete alphabetical catalog of USDA records in this source topic
Exact USDA descriptionCaloriesProteinFiberSodiumSource amountReferences
Barbecue pork, no sauceFDC 2706400 249 kcalper 100 g 24.8 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 422 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork skin rindsFDC 2705902 544 kcalper 100 g 61.3 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 1,820 mgper 100 g 30 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, bellyFDC 2705901 404 kcalper 100 g 26.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 448 mgper 100 g 60 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, bonesFDC 2705897 236 kcalper 100 g 26.2 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 364 mgper 100 g 45 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, carnitasFDC 2705864 271 kcalper 100 g 24.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 440 mgper 100 g 135 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eatenFDC 2705870 229 kcalper 100 g 25.1 gper 100 g 0.4 gper 100 g 409 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, chop, coated, lean only eatenFDC 2705871 208 kcalper 100 g 26 gper 100 g 0.4 gper 100 g 413 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, chop, lean and fat eatenFDC 2705867 195 kcalper 100 g 27 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 351 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, chop, lean only eatenFDC 2705868 171 kcalper 100 g 28 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 356 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, cracklingsFDC 2705895 569 kcalper 100 g 45 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 1,290 mgper 100 g 90 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, earsFDC 2705896 236 kcalper 100 g 26.2 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 364 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, groundFDC 2705863 299 kcalper 100 g 26.9 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 395 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, ham hocksFDC 2705900 268 kcalper 100 g 14.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 1,040 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, pig's feetFDC 2705898 236 kcalper 100 g 21.8 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 380 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, pig's feet, pickledFDC 2705899 140 kcalper 100 g 11.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 946 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, ribsFDC 2705894 254 kcalper 100 g 16.2 gper 100 g 0.3 gper 100 g 678 mgper 100 g 105 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, roastFDC 2705882 181 kcalper 100 g 26.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 353 mgper 100 g 60 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, steak, coatedFDC 2705876 275 kcalper 100 g 24.2 gper 100 g 0.4 gper 100 g 352 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, steak, lean and fat eatenFDC 2705874 264 kcalper 100 g 25.2 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 316 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, steak, lean only eatenFDC 2705875 230 kcalper 100 g 26.7 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 318 mgper 100 g 120 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Pork, tenderloinFDC 2705877 134 kcalper 100 g 24.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 339 mgper 100 g 60 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗

Boundaries and provenance

What this collection can—and cannot—tell you.

This page summarizes USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) records from 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024. FNDDS supplies the nutrient profiles used for foods reported in What We Eat in America, the dietary component of NHANES. Each value here remains tied to one exact FDC record; the complete catalog provides direct links so the source can be checked rather than taken on trust.

USDA describes FNDDS nutrient profiles as average values for generic representations of foods likely consumed in the United States—not profiles of specific products. Its gram weights for portions are likewise estimates for groups of foods and may not cover every available size. That distinction matters: a database measure is evidence for scaling a plausible match, not proof that the same weight or formulation was on a visitor’s plate.

The records are not laboratory measurements of every possible “Pork” preparation. Restaurant recipes change, packaged products are reformulated, homemade ingredient ratios vary, and cooking can change water weight. A photo also cannot reliably reveal every hidden ingredient or gram weight. The central range describes variation among the records selected for this topic, not uncertainty around a single meal.

The median is not a default calorie count. The 10th and 90th percentiles are not lower and upper recommendations. The minimum and maximum are not promises that every real version falls inside the observed span. These statistics are tools for navigating a source collection while keeping the denominator, record name, and normal recipe variation visible.

Nutrient values do not establish whether a food is appropriate for a particular person or condition. This wiki does not diagnose deficiencies, prescribe targets, or replace advice from a qualified professional. If accuracy matters for an allergy, medical diet, or clinician-directed limit, use verified ingredient information and the guidance relevant to that situation.

Why no overall ranking appears.

A record can report more protein and also differ in sodium, fiber, energy, fat, portion weight, or ingredients. Choosing one metric as a universal score would hide those tradeoffs and imply a value judgment the data cannot support. The alphabetical catalog and side-by-side statistics are intentionally descriptive.

For primary-source context, read USDA’s FNDDS 2021–2023 documentation. For Feast’s import, filtering, portion-scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules, read the nutrition-page methodology. For an exact item, use its profile and FoodData Central link rather than citing this collection-level summary alone.

Common questions

Using the “Pork” collection responsibly

Is the median the expected nutrition for my food?

No. It is the middle value among these 21 source records on a 100-gram basis. Your recipe, brand, preparation, and portion may align more closely with one specific record or may fall outside this collection.

Why compare 100 grams instead of one serving?

Source servings can have different gram weights and measure labels. Holding weight at 100 grams makes concentration comparable. After choosing a record, its household measures are more useful for estimating the amount actually eaten.

Does the upper end of a nutrient range mean “better”?

No. The position only describes that nutrient within this source collection. It does not evaluate the whole food, determine an appropriate portion, or account for an individual’s needs.

Which number should I log?

Start with the record whose exact wording most closely matches the food. Use a listed measure or gram estimate, then add missing recipe or preparation context. Keep the result as an estimate unless you have a current label or weighed recipe.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 12 exact records behind Pork source topic. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Pork skin rinds is higher in sodium per 100 g

Pork skin rinds reports 1,820 mg versus 339 mg for Pork, tenderloin: a 1,481 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Pork, bones is denser; Pork, chop, lean only eaten is higher in its source amount

Pork, bones reports 364 mg per 100 g and 164 mg in USDA source amount (45 g). Pork, chop, lean only eaten reports a lower 356 mg per 100 g but a higher 427 mg in USDA source amount (120 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Pork, chop, lean only eaten” from “Pork skin rinds”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Pork source topic, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Pork

Pork, belly and Pork, bones are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Best next guide for this exact record Pork, chop

Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten and Pork, chop, lean only eaten are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 339 mg in Pork, tenderloin to 1,820 mg in Pork skin rinds, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Salt, table

USDA input 2047 appears in 11 of 12 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 0.5–0.9 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked

USDA input 10007 appears in 2 of 12 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 10–30 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Vitamin D: density and serving context

In this page’s records, vitamin D runs from 0 µg in Pork skin rinds to 1.6 µg in Pork, belly, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Inspect an exact record Pork, chop, lean only eaten

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2705868 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path