Meat & poultrymoderate variability

Pork, steak, coated calories: 330 per 1 steak, any size (120 g)

This exact USDA record reports 330 calories for 1 steak, any size (120 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 steak, any size · 120 g

Calories
330 kcal
Protein
29 g
Carbohydrate
8.6 g
Total fat
19 g
Fiber
0.5 g
Sodium
422 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 steak, any size · 120 g

330calories

Pork, steak, coated

Protein
29 g
Carbs
8.6 g
Fat
19 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2705876

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 330 calories for 1 steak, any size at 120 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 275 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 29 g protein, 0.5 g fiber, and 422 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is pork, steak, ns as to fat eaten, representing 88% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 steak, any size at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 47–371 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2705876: “Pork, steak, coated.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2705876, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 cubic inch” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 cubic inchUSDA-listed household measure 17 g 47 kcal 4.1 g 0.1 g 60 mg
1 steak, any sizeUSDA-listed household measure 120 g 330 kcal 29 g 0.5 g 422 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 135 g 371 kcal 32.7 g 0.5 g 475 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Pork

The comparison set contains 21 exact records in the Pork USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2705876’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

275 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
236 kcal
Middle 50%
208–271 kcal

Based on 21 records reporting energy.

Protein

lower quarter

24.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
26 g
Middle 50%
24.6–26.7 g

Based on 21 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

upper quarter

0.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0 g
Middle 50%
0–0 g

Based on 21 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

352 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
395 mg
Middle 50%
353–448 mg

Based on 21 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2705876’s 120 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron2 mg

≈ 14% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Potassium372 mg

≈ 8% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat6.4 g

≈ 32% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium422 mg

≈ 18% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Pork, steak, coated,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2705870 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 cubic inch to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 17 g and 135 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 47 kcal to 371 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2705870

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 5.2 g more total fat than “Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Pork, steak, NS as to fat eaten

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Pork, steak, NS as to fat eaten supplies 88% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “steak; coated” fits. Inspect FDC 2705870 when “chop; coated; lean and fat eaten” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Pork, steak, coated

Exact source wording
“Pork, steak, coated”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705876 · FNDDS 22201400
Named qualifiers
steak · coated
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pork, steak, NS as to fat eaten

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten

Exact source wording
“Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705870 · FNDDS 22101310
Named qualifiers
chop · coated · lean and fat eaten
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean and fat, with added solution, cooked, broiled · Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, broiled · Salt, table

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “steak” and “coated”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordPork, steak, coated 120 g330 kcal 275 kcal 24.2 g 15.8 g 0.4 g 352 mg
Pork, steak, lean and fat eaten 120 g317 kcal 264 kcal 25.2 g 17.4 g 0 g 316 mg
Pork, steak, lean only eaten 120 g276 kcal 230 kcal 26.7 g 12.8 g 0 g 318 mg
Pork, carnitas 135 g366 kcal 271 kcal 24.6 g 18.3 g 0 g 440 mg
Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten 120 g275 kcal 229 kcal 25.1 g 10.6 g 0.4 g 409 mg
Pork, ribs 105 g267 kcal 254 kcal 16.2 g 15.1 g 0.3 g 678 mg
Pork, ground 85 g254 kcal 299 kcal 26.9 g 21.2 g 0 g 395 mg

How to compare FDC 2705876: its source amount is 120 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2705876, the 5 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 slice, any size

83 kcal

30 g

1 steak, any size

330 kcal

120 g

1 oz yields

55 kcal

20 g

1 cubic inch

47 kcal

17 g

1 cup

371 kcal

135 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2705876, Cholesterol is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Cholesterol

103.2 mg≈ 34% Daily Value

Saturated fat

6.4 g≈ 32% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2705876’s 120 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2705876 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 29 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2705876 at 120 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 422 mg sodium, about 18% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 120 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 330 kcal Not established
Protein 29 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 8.6 g 3%
Total fat 19 g 24%
Dietary fiber 0.5 g 2%
Sugars 0.7 g Not established
Sodium 422.4 mg 18%
Saturated fat 6.4 g 32%
Monounsaturated Fat 8.4 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 3 g Not established
Cholesterol 103.2 mg 34%
Potassium 372 mg 8%
Calcium 49.2 mg 4%
Iron 2.5 mg 14%
Magnesium 28.8 mg 7%
Vitamin C 0 mg 0%
Vitamin D 1.2 µg 6%
Vitamin A 1.2 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 60.5 g Not established

For FDC 2705876, approximate percentages divide the displayed 120 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2705876 to 3 source inputs totaling 100 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Pork, steak, coated” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Pork, steak, NS as to fat eaten, Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plain, Vegetable oil, NFS. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Pork, steak, NS as to fat eatenUSDA ingredient 22201100 88 GM 88 g 88%
2 Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plainUSDA ingredient 18079 · encyclopedia page available 10 GM 10 g 10%
3 Vegetable oil, NFSUSDA ingredient 82101000 · encyclopedia page available 2 GM 2 g 2%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.
  • NS as to… means “not specified as to…” the detail that follows. It preserves an unknown distinction; it does not mean the ingredient or characteristic is absent.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2705876, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Pork” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories275 kcal229 kcal+46 kcal
Protein24.2 g25.1 g−0.9 g
Carbohydrate7.2 g7.2 g+0 g
Total fat15.8 g10.6 g+5.2 g
Dietary fiber0.4 g0.4 gSame listed value
Sodium352 mg409 mg−57 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 46 more calories, 5.2 g more total fat, and 57 mg less sodium than “Pork, chop, coated, lean and fat eaten.”

Only this record lists Pork, steak, NS as to fat eaten. Only the comparison record lists Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean and fat, with added solution, cooked, broiled; Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, broiled; Salt, table. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plain; Vegetable oil, NFS.

Listed only in this record: Pork, steak, NS as to fat eaten.

Listed only in the comparison: Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean and fat, with added solution, cooked, broiled; Pork, fresh, loin, top loin (chops), boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, broiled; Salt, table.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 120 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 steak, any size (120 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 120 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular (120 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2705876 with FDC 2705870 at equal mass; use their 120 g and 120 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2705876 versus FDC 2705870 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full pork source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2705876 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, cut and fat trim, cooking method, breading, marinade, or sauce.

For “Pork, steak, coated,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    cut and fat trim

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    breading, marinade, or sauce

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2705876 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 275 kcal per 100 g becomes 330 kcal at 120 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 steak, any size has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2705876

FNDDS food code: 22201400

The scaling for FDC 2705876 can be exact while the match to “Pork, steak, coated” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 120 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.