Mixed disheshigher variability

Stew, lamb calories: 298 per 1 cup (255 g)

This exact USDA record reports 298 calories for 1 cup (255 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 cup · 255 g

Calories
298 kcal
Protein
20.9 g
Carbohydrate
16 g
Total fat
16.3 g
Fiber
3.3 g
Sodium
785 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 255 g

298calories

Stew, lamb

Protein
20.9 g
Carbs
16 g
Fat
16.3 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706660

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 298 calories for 1 cup at 255 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 117 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 20.9 g protein, 3.3 g fiber, and 785 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is vegetables as ingredient in stews, representing 49.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 4 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 cup at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706660: “Stew, lamb.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706660, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 191.3 g 224 kcal 15.7 g 2.5 g 589 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 255 g 298 kcal 20.9 g 3.3 g 785 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 318.8 g 373 kcal 26.1 g 4.1 g 982 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2706660’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

117 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

8.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1.3 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

308 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706660’s 255 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin A; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin A329 µg

≈ 37% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin C18 mg

≈ 20% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium785 mg

≈ 34% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat6.8 g

≈ 34% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Stew, lamb,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706519 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 255 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 191.3–318.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 224 kcal and 373 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706519

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1 g more total fat than “Stew, pork.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Vegetables as ingredient in stews

    The source formulation has 4 input rows; Vegetables as ingredient in stews supplies 49.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “lamb” fits. Inspect FDC 2706519 when “pork” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Stew, lamb

Exact source wording
“Stew, lamb”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706660 · FNDDS 27330210
Named qualifiers
lamb
Source inputs unique in this pair
Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Stew, pork

Exact source wording
“Stew, pork”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706519 · FNDDS 27221150
Named qualifiers
pork
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pork, fresh, shoulder, (Boston butt), blade (steaks), separable lean and fat, cooked, braised

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “lamb”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordStew, lamb 255 g298 kcal 117 kcal 8.2 g 6.4 g 1.3 g 308 mg
Stew, pork 255 g278 kcal 109 kcal 8.4 g 5.4 g 1.3 g 304 mg
Stew, beef 255 g273 kcal 107 kcal 8.8 g 5.1 g 1.3 g 307 mg
Stew, beef, with pasta 255 g337 kcal 132 kcal 9.8 g 5.2 g 1.1 g 299 mg
Stew, pork, with pasta 255 g339 kcal 133 kcal 9.4 g 5.6 g 1.1 g 296 mg
Stew, beef, canned 255 g255 kcal 100 kcal 5 g 6 g 1.1 g 395 mg
Lamb or mutton and potatoes with gravy 189 g244 kcal 129 kcal 5.1 g 6.5 g 1 g 308 mg

How to compare FDC 2706660: its source amount is 255 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706660, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

298 kcal

255 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706660, Vitamin A is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin A

329 µg≈ 37% Daily Value

Sodium

785.4 mg≈ 34% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706660’s 255 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706660 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 20.9 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2706660 at 255 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 3.3 g dietary fiber, about 12% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 785 mg sodium, about 34% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 255 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 298 kcal Not established
Protein 20.9 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 16 g 6%
Total fat 16.3 g 21%
Dietary fiber 3.3 g 12%
Sugars 4 g Not established
Sodium 785.4 mg 34%
Saturated fat 6.8 g 34%
Monounsaturated Fat 6.7 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 1.3 g Not established
Cholesterol 74 mg 25%
Potassium 647.7 mg 14%
Calcium 40.8 mg 3%
Iron 2 mg 11%
Magnesium 43.4 mg 10%
Vitamin C 17.9 mg 20%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 329 µg 37%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 198.4 g Not established

For FDC 2706660, approximate percentages divide the displayed 255 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706660 to 4 source inputs totaling 100.7 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Stew, lamb” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

4 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Vegetables as ingredient in stews, Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, Beverages, water, tap, drinking. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.7 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beverages, water, tap, drinkingUSDA ingredient 14411 · encyclopedia page available 20 GM 20 g 19.9%
2 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.7 GM 0.7 g 0.7%
3 Vegetables as ingredient in stewsUSDA ingredient 99997820 · encyclopedia page available 50 GM 50 g 49.7%
4 Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cookedUSDA ingredient 17002 · encyclopedia page available 30 GM 30 g 29.8%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706660, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories117 kcal109 kcal+8 kcal
Protein8.2 g8.4 g−0.2 g
Carbohydrate6.3 g6.3 gSame listed value
Total fat6.4 g5.4 g+1 g
Dietary fiber1.3 g1.3 gSame listed value
Sodium308 mg304 mg+4 mg

Plain-English read

The six displayed nutrient values are close under a conservative materiality screen. Small differences remain exact source values, not evidence that one food is preferable.

Only this record lists Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked. Only the comparison record lists Pork, fresh, shoulder, (Boston butt), blade (steaks), separable lean and fat, cooked, braised. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Beverages, water, tap, drinking; Salt, table; Vegetables as ingredient in stews.

Listed only in this record: Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked.

Listed only in the comparison: Pork, fresh, shoulder, (Boston butt), blade (steaks), separable lean and fat, cooked, braised.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706660 with FDC 2706519 at equal mass; use their 255 g and 255 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706660 versus FDC 2706519 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Stew, lamb,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706660 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 117 kcal per 100 g becomes 298 kcal at 255 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 cup has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706660

FNDDS food code: 27330210

The scaling for FDC 2706660 can be exact while the match to “Stew, lamb” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 255 g weight, 4-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.