Mixed disheshigher variability

Stew, pork calories: 278 per 1 cup (255 g)

This exact USDA record reports 278 calories for 1 cup (255 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 cup · 255 g

Calories
278 kcal
Protein
21.3 g
Carbohydrate
16 g
Total fat
13.8 g
Fiber
3.3 g
Sodium
775 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 255 g

278calories

Stew, pork

Protein
21.3 g
Carbs
16 g
Fat
13.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706519

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 278 calories for 1 cup at 255 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 109 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 21.3 g protein, 3.3 g fiber, and 775 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is vegetables as ingredient in stews, representing 49.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 4 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 cup at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706519: “Stew, pork.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706519, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 191.3 g 208 kcal 16 g 2.5 g 581 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 255 g 278 kcal 21.3 g 3.3 g 775 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 318.8 g 347 kcal 26.6 g 4.1 g 969 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2706519’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

109 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

8.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1.3 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

304 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706519’s 255 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin A; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin A329 µg

≈ 37% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin C18 mg

≈ 20% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium775 mg

≈ 34% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat5 g

≈ 25% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Stew, pork,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706520 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 255 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 191.3–318.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 208 kcal and 347 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706520

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 4.5 g less carbohydrate than “Stew, pork, with pasta.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Vegetables as ingredient in stews

    The source formulation has 4 input rows; Vegetables as ingredient in stews supplies 49.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “pork” fits. Inspect FDC 2706520 when “pork; with pasta” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Stew, pork

Exact source wording
“Stew, pork”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706519 · FNDDS 27221150
Named qualifiers
pork

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Stew, pork, with pasta

Exact source wording
“Stew, pork, with pasta”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706520 · FNDDS 27221170
Named qualifiers
pork · with pasta
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “pork”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordStew, pork 255 g278 kcal 109 kcal 8.4 g 5.4 g 1.3 g 304 mg
Stew, pork, with pasta 255 g339 kcal 133 kcal 9.4 g 5.6 g 1.1 g 296 mg
Stew, beef 255 g273 kcal 107 kcal 8.8 g 5.1 g 1.3 g 307 mg
Stew, lamb 255 g298 kcal 117 kcal 8.2 g 6.4 g 1.3 g 308 mg
Guisada, pork 255 g301 kcal 118 kcal 10.3 g 7.1 g 0.5 g 300 mg
Pork hash 142 g264 kcal 186 kcal 12.9 g 13.7 g 0.5 g 486 mg
Stew, beef, canned 255 g255 kcal 100 kcal 5 g 6 g 1.1 g 395 mg

How to compare FDC 2706519: its source amount is 255 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706519, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

278 kcal

255 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706519, Vitamin A is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin A

329 µg≈ 37% Daily Value

Sodium

775.2 mg≈ 34% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706519’s 255 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706519 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 21.3 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2706519 at 255 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 3.3 g dietary fiber, about 12% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 775 mg sodium, about 34% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 255 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 278 kcal Not established
Protein 21.3 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 16 g 6%
Total fat 13.8 g 18%
Dietary fiber 3.3 g 12%
Sugars 4 g Not established
Sodium 775.2 mg 34%
Saturated fat 5 g 25%
Monounsaturated Fat 6.1 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 1.7 g Not established
Cholesterol 74 mg 25%
Potassium 642.6 mg 14%
Calcium 48.5 mg 4%
Iron 1.9 mg 11%
Magnesium 43.4 mg 10%
Vitamin C 17.9 mg 20%
Vitamin D 1 µg 5%
Vitamin A 329 µg 37%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 199.4 g Not established

For FDC 2706519, approximate percentages divide the displayed 255 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706519 to 4 source inputs totaling 100.7 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Stew, pork” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

4 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Vegetables as ingredient in stews, Pork, fresh, shoulder, (Boston butt), blade (steaks), separable lean and fat, cooked, braised, Beverages, water, tap, drinking. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.7 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beverages, water, tap, drinkingUSDA ingredient 14411 · encyclopedia page available 20 GM 20 g 19.9%
2 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.7 GM 0.7 g 0.7%
3 Vegetables as ingredient in stewsUSDA ingredient 99997820 · encyclopedia page available 50 GM 50 g 49.7%
4 Pork, fresh, shoulder, (Boston butt), blade (steaks), separable lean and fat, cooked, braisedUSDA ingredient 10081 · encyclopedia page available 30 GM 30 g 29.8%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706519, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories109 kcal133 kcal−24 kcal
Protein8.4 g9.4 g−1 g
Carbohydrate6.3 g10.8 g−4.5 g
Total fat5.4 g5.6 g−0.2 g
Dietary fiber1.3 g1.1 g+0.2 g
Sodium304 mg296 mg+8 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 24 less calories, 1 g less protein, and 4.5 g less carbohydrate than “Stew, pork, with pasta.”

Only the comparison record lists Pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Beverages, water, tap, drinking; Salt, table; Vegetables as ingredient in stews; Pork, fresh, shoulder, (Boston butt), blade (steaks), separable lean and fat, cooked, braised.

Listed only in the comparison: Pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706519 with FDC 2706520 at equal mass; use their 255 g and 255 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706519 versus FDC 2706520 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Stew, pork,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706519 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 109 kcal per 100 g becomes 278 kcal at 255 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 cup has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706519

FNDDS food code: 27221150

The scaling for FDC 2706519 can be exact while the match to “Stew, pork” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 255 g weight, 4-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.