USDA source topicBeans, nuts & protein foods

USDA Protein and nutritional powders records: median 396 calories per 100 g across 11 foods

Across 11 exact USDA Survey Foods records in this topic, median energy is 396 kcal per 100 grams and the central 80% runs from 358 kcal to 448 kcal. These are collection statistics, not a calorie estimate for a particular meal.

The complete collection preserves all 11 source descriptions, household measures, nutrient distributions, and FoodData Central citations so the summary can be checked against the underlying records.

Distribution at a glance

Where calorie density sits in this USDA record set

Percentiles summarize these 11 cited records; they are not a confidence interval or a prediction for one meal.

  1. 10th percentile 358 kcal
    358 kcal
  2. Median 396 kcal
    396 kcal
  3. 90th percentile 448 kcal
    448 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What is included?

The exact descriptions define the topic.

USDA places these records in the “Protein and nutritional powders” survey-food category. Within Feast’s broader navigation, they appear under Beans, nuts & protein foods (11 records). The category label is useful for discovery, but it does not mean every record uses the same recipe, brand, cooking method, or portion.

The current collection includes Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast); Nutritional powder mix, light (Muscle Milk); Nutritional powder mix (Slim Fast); Nutritional powder mix (Isopure); Nutritional powder mix (Carnation Instant Breakfast); Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Slim Fast). Those examples show why the exact wording matters. The complete alphabetical catalog farther down the page preserves all 11 descriptions instead of replacing them with one generic average.

A distribution view of the source set

Median and central nutrient ranges per 100 grams

The central range runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the 11 records on this page. It shows the middle of this finite source set without treating its endpoints as typical. Because this topic contains fewer than 20 records, treat the percentile positions as a compact map of the listed entries—not as a stable population estimate.

On smaller screens, focus a topic table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Median, central interval, and observed per-100-gram nutrient span for this USDA source topic
NutrientMedianCentral 80%Observed spanRecords
Caloriesper 100 g396 kcal358 kcal–448 kcal353 kcal–448 kcal11
Proteinper 100 g45.7 g8.1 g–58.1 g8.1 g–66.7 g11
Carbohydrateper 100 g41 g18.5 g–73.9 g18 g–73.9 g11
Total fatper 100 g10.7 g1.4 g–13.5 g1.2 g–17.1 g11
Dietary fiberper 100 g2 g0 g–18.1 g0 g–18.2 g11
Total sugarsper 100 g20.6 g3.6 g–40.5 g1.2 g–65.8 g11
Sodiumper 100 g452 mg329 mg–717 mg250 mg–1,210 mg11
Potassiumper 100 g840 mg247 mg–1,130 mg247 mg–1,700 mg11
Calciumper 100 g500 mg256 mg–1,040 mg95 mg–1,200 mg11
Ironper 100 g6.4 mg0.7 mg–22.5 mg0.7 mg–24.8 mg11

All rows use the same 100-gram denominator and values from the cited records. The interval is descriptive, not a recommended intake range or statistical confidence interval.

A comparatively wide central spread

Dietary fiber: 2 g calculated median

Among 11 “Protein and nutritional powders” records, the central interval for dietary fiber extends from 0 g to 18.1 g per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0 g to 18.2 g.

10th percentile: Nutritional powder mix (EAS Soy Protein Powder) reports 0 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: Nutritional powder mix (Slim Fast) reports 18.1 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Iron: 6.4 mg calculated median

Among 11 “Protein and nutritional powders” records, the central interval for iron extends from 0.7 mg to 22.5 mg per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0.7 mg to 24.8 mg.

10th percentile: Nutritional powder mix (Slim Fast) reports 0.7 mg, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Herbalife) reports 22.5 mg, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Total sugars: 20.6 g calculated median

Among 11 “Protein and nutritional powders” records, the central interval for total sugars extends from 3.6 g to 40.5 g per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 1.2 g to 65.8 g.

10th percentile: Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Herbalife) reports 3.6 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: Nutritional powder mix (EAS Soy Protein Powder) reports 40.5 g, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

The three callouts above are the widest central spreads relative to each metric’s midpoint, with a minimum scale applied so near-zero medians do not dominate. The complete table remains the primary record of all ten metrics.

Preparation language in the records

Source descriptions reveal meaningful distinctions.

The counts below report words and phrases that appear explicitly in the 11 USDA descriptions. They can help narrow a search to a closer record. They do not prove that the named preparation caused a nutrient difference, because these survey-food records are not controlled experiments.

No preparation phrase from the wiki’s controlled vocabulary appears consistently enough to summarize this topic. Use the exact record catalog instead of inferring a shared method.

Portion context

Household measures answer a different question than 100 grams.

11 of 11 records (100%) include at least one named measure in the source data. Together those records provide 17 usable named measures.

A cup, slice, piece, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can represent a different amount of food. Even two measures with the same label may have different gram weights across records. Open the closest profile and use its listed weight instead of transferring a measure from another record.

USDA’s representative source amount is also not necessarily what a visitor ate. For equal-weight comparison, use the 100-gram table. For meal estimation, match the exact description first, then match the amount, and finally account for additions or preparation details absent from the selected record.

Common named measures in this topic

Choosing a closer record

Use a sequence, not a guess disguised as precision.

  1. 01

    Match the exact description

    Look for the closest food name, preparation, additions, and context. “Protein and nutritional powders” is the collection label; the individual description is the actual reference.

  2. 02

    Compare on equal weight

    Use the per-100-gram values when comparing two records. This keeps the denominator fixed and prevents different source-serving weights from masquerading as a food difference.

  3. 03

    Scale the closest listed measure

    Open the profile, select a named household measure when one fits, or enter a gram estimate. Treat scaled decimals as arithmetic from the source—not greater certainty about the plate.

  4. 04

    Add missing context

    Brand, recipe, cooking fat, sauce, toppings, substitutions, and edible portion can move the result. A current package label or weighed recipe may be more specific than a generic survey-food record.

Controlled contrasts

Related records worth comparing directly

These pairs passed Feast’s similarity, material-difference, and diversity screens. Each page keeps weight fixed at 100 grams, shows both exact source descriptions and formulations, and avoids treating the records as a controlled experiment.

Browse all controlled food-record comparisons →

From source topic to familiar meal

Meal guides fully represented inside this collection

Every linked record in these guides belongs to this exact USDA topic. The guide layer organizes recognizable meal families and variations while the collection below preserves the complete source catalog.

Complete source catalog

All 11 “Protein and nutritional powders” records

Records are alphabetical, not ranked. Every row links to a Feast profile with household measures, the 21-nutrient Feast panel, estimate factors, methodology, and the exact USDA FoodData Central source where available.

Complete alphabetical catalog of USDA records in this source topic
Exact USDA descriptionCaloriesProteinFiberSodiumSource amountReferences
Nutritional powder mix (Carnation Instant Breakfast)FDC 2710729 353 kcalper 100 g 19.9 gper 100 g 0.4 gper 100 g 385 mgper 100 g 37 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix (EAS Soy Protein Powder)FDC 2710732 405 kcalper 100 g 47.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 452 mgper 100 g 44 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix (EAS Whey Protein Powder)FDC 2710731 385 kcalper 100 g 66.7 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 385 mgper 100 g 39 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix (Isopure)FDC 2710734 359 kcalper 100 g 58.1 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 372 mgper 100 g 87 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix (Muscle Milk)FDC 2710735 411 kcalper 100 g 45.7 gper 100 g 7.1 gper 100 g 329 mgper 100 g 70 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix (Slim Fast)FDC 2710737 448 kcalper 100 g 8.1 gper 100 g 18.1 gper 100 g 472 mgper 100 g 26 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Herbalife)FDC 2710733 392 kcalper 100 g 53.6 gper 100 g 0 gper 100 g 1,210 mgper 100 g 25 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Slim Fast)FDC 2710739 433 kcalper 100 g 27.9 gper 100 g 18.2 gper 100 g 495 mgper 100 g 26 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix, light (Muscle Milk)FDC 2710736 396 kcalper 100 g 50 gper 100 g 2 gper 100 g 250 mgper 100 g 50 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast)FDC 2710730 358 kcalper 100 g 35.8 gper 100 g 2 gper 100 g 717 mgper 100 g 20 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Slim Fast)FDC 2710738 448 kcalper 100 g 8.1 gper 100 g 18.1 gper 100 g 472 mgper 100 g 14 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗

Boundaries and provenance

What this collection can—and cannot—tell you.

This page summarizes USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) records from 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024. FNDDS supplies the nutrient profiles used for foods reported in What We Eat in America, the dietary component of NHANES. Each value here remains tied to one exact FDC record; the complete catalog provides direct links so the source can be checked rather than taken on trust.

USDA describes FNDDS nutrient profiles as average values for generic representations of foods likely consumed in the United States—not profiles of specific products. Its gram weights for portions are likewise estimates for groups of foods and may not cover every available size. That distinction matters: a database measure is evidence for scaling a plausible match, not proof that the same weight or formulation was on a visitor’s plate.

The records are not laboratory measurements of every possible “Protein and nutritional powders” preparation. Restaurant recipes change, packaged products are reformulated, homemade ingredient ratios vary, and cooking can change water weight. A photo also cannot reliably reveal every hidden ingredient or gram weight. The central range describes variation among the records selected for this topic, not uncertainty around a single meal.

The median is not a default calorie count. The 10th and 90th percentiles are not lower and upper recommendations. The minimum and maximum are not promises that every real version falls inside the observed span. These statistics are tools for navigating a source collection while keeping the denominator, record name, and normal recipe variation visible.

Nutrient values do not establish whether a food is appropriate for a particular person or condition. This wiki does not diagnose deficiencies, prescribe targets, or replace advice from a qualified professional. If accuracy matters for an allergy, medical diet, or clinician-directed limit, use verified ingredient information and the guidance relevant to that situation.

Why no overall ranking appears.

A record can report more protein and also differ in sodium, fiber, energy, fat, portion weight, or ingredients. Choosing one metric as a universal score would hide those tradeoffs and imply a value judgment the data cannot support. The alphabetical catalog and side-by-side statistics are intentionally descriptive.

For primary-source context, read USDA’s FNDDS 2021–2023 documentation. For Feast’s import, filtering, portion-scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules, read the nutrition-page methodology. For an exact item, use its profile and FoodData Central link rather than citing this collection-level summary alone.

Common questions

Using the “Protein and nutritional powders” collection responsibly

Is the median the expected nutrition for my food?

No. It is the middle value among these 11 source records on a 100-gram basis. Your recipe, brand, preparation, and portion may align more closely with one specific record or may fall outside this collection.

Why compare 100 grams instead of one serving?

Source servings can have different gram weights and measure labels. Holding weight at 100 grams makes concentration comparable. After choosing a record, its household measures are more useful for estimating the amount actually eaten.

Does the upper end of a nutrient range mean “better”?

No. The position only describes that nutrient within this source collection. It does not evaluate the whole food, determine an appropriate portion, or account for an individual’s needs.

Which number should I log?

Start with the record whose exact wording most closely matches the food. Use a listed measure or gram estimate, then add missing recipe or preparation context. Keep the result as an estimate unless you have a current label or weighed recipe.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 9 exact records behind Protein and nutritional powders source topic. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Slim Fast) is higher in dietary fiber per 100 g

Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Slim Fast) reports 18.2 g versus 0 g for Nutritional powder mix (EAS Soy Protein Powder): a 18.2 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast) is denser; Nutritional powder mix (Carnation Instant Breakfast) is higher in its source amount

Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast) reports 358 kcal per 100 g and 72 kcal in USDA source amount (20 g). Nutritional powder mix (Carnation Instant Breakfast) reports a lower 353 kcal per 100 g but a higher 131 kcal in USDA source amount (37 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast)” from “Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Slim Fast)”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Protein and nutritional powders source topic, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Put the observed spread in corpus context Dietary fiber: density and serving context

In this page’s records, dietary fiber runs from 0 g in Nutritional powder mix (EAS Soy Protein Powder) to 18.2 g in Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Slim Fast), all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Vitamin D: density and serving context

In this page’s records, vitamin D runs from 0 µg in Nutritional powder mix (Carnation Instant Breakfast) to 12.5 µg in Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Herbalife), all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Inspect an exact record Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast)

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710730 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path
9 records share this broad food family Beans, nuts & protein foods: broader category context

Nutritional powder mix, sugar free (Carnation Instant Breakfast) and Nutritional powder mix, light (Muscle Milk), plus 7 more are assigned to Feast’s Beans, nuts & protein foods editorial category. Use the category page to compare nearby foods at a broad level; keep the exact USDA descriptions on this page for record-level decisions.

Follow this evidence path
Check another exact record Nutritional powder mix (Carnation Instant Breakfast)

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710729 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving context

In this page’s records, iron runs from 0.7 mg in Nutritional powder mix (Slim Fast) to 24.8 mg in Nutritional powder mix, high protein (Slim Fast), all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 95 mg in Nutritional powder mix (EAS Soy Protein Powder) to 1,200 mg in Nutritional powder mix, light (Muscle Milk), all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path