USDA source topicSoups & stews

Soups, cream-based: nutrition range, portions, and source records

This wiki page organizes 13 exact USDA Survey Foods records labeled “Soups, cream-based.” It shows the median and central spread of reported nutrients per 100 grams, explains the portion and preparation language present in the records, and keeps every underlying profile and citation available for inspection.

What is included?

The exact descriptions define the topic.

USDA places these records in the “Soups, cream-based” survey-food category. Within Feast’s broader navigation, they appear under Soups & stews (13 records). The category label is useful for discovery, but it does not mean every record uses the same recipe, brand, cooking method, or portion.

The current collection includes Soup, pumpkin; Soup, peanut; Soup, French onion; Soup, broccoli cheese; Soup, bisque. Those examples show why the exact wording matters. The complete alphabetical catalog farther down the page preserves all 13 descriptions instead of replacing them with one generic average.

A robust view of the data

Median and central nutrient ranges per 100 grams

The central range runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the records on this page. The observed minimum and maximum are included for transparency, but the middle interval is generally more useful for seeing the collection without letting one extreme record dominate.

NutrientMedianCentral 80%Observed spanRecords
Caloriesper 100 g88 kcal72 kcal–105 kcal70 kcal–109 kcal13
Proteinper 100 g3.1 g1.3 g–4.2 g1.1 g–5.5 g13
Carbohydrateper 100 g6.9 g5.9 g–10.3 g5.7 g–11.8 g13
Total fatper 100 g4.8 g4.6 g–5.7 g4.5 g–6.4 g13
Dietary fiberper 100 g1.1 g0.9 g–1.5 g0.9 g–1.7 g13
Total sugarsper 100 g1.7 g1 g–2.5 g1 g–2.6 g13
Sodiumper 100 g246 mg240 mg–313 mg239 mg–378 mg13
Potassiumper 100 g170 mg124 mg–226 mg93 mg–243 mg13
Calciumper 100 g19 mg15 mg–92 mg15 mg–138 mg13
Ironper 100 g0.5 mg0.3 mg–0.7 mg0.3 mg–0.7 mg13

All rows use the same 100-gram denominator and values from the cited records. The interval is descriptive, not a recommended intake range or statistical confidence interval.

Calories context

88 kcal at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported calories value is 88 kcal per 100 grams. The central records run from 72 kcal to 105 kcal, while the complete observed span is 70 kcal to 109 kcal.

Soup, pumpkin is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, French onion is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Protein context

3.1 g at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported protein value is 3.1 g per 100 grams. The central records run from 1.3 g to 4.2 g, while the complete observed span is 1.1 g to 5.5 g.

Soup, cream of tomato is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, broccoli cheese is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Carbohydrate context

6.9 g at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported carbohydrate value is 6.9 g per 100 grams. The central records run from 5.9 g to 10.3 g, while the complete observed span is 5.7 g to 11.8 g.

Soup, bisque is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, potato is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Total fat context

4.8 g at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported total fat value is 4.8 g per 100 grams. The central records run from 4.6 g to 5.7 g, while the complete observed span is 4.5 g to 6.4 g.

Soup, broccoli cheese is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, pepperpot is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Dietary fiber context

1.1 g at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported dietary fiber value is 1.1 g per 100 grams. The central records run from 0.9 g to 1.5 g, while the complete observed span is 0.9 g to 1.7 g.

Soup, bisque is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, pumpkin is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Total sugars context

1.7 g at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported total sugars value is 1.7 g per 100 grams. The central records run from 1 g to 2.5 g, while the complete observed span is 1 g to 2.6 g.

Soup, New England clam chowder is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, French onion is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Sodium context

246 mg at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported sodium value is 246 mg per 100 grams. The central records run from 240 mg to 313 mg, while the complete observed span is 239 mg to 378 mg.

Soup, potato is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, broccoli cheese is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Potassium context

170 mg at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported potassium value is 170 mg per 100 grams. The central records run from 124 mg to 226 mg, while the complete observed span is 93 mg to 243 mg.

Soup, pumpkin is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, potato is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Calcium context

19 mg at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported calcium value is 19 mg per 100 grams. The central records run from 15 mg to 92 mg, while the complete observed span is 15 mg to 138 mg.

Soup, cream of mushroom is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, broccoli cheese is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Iron context

0.5 mg at the collection midpoint

Across 13 “Soups, cream-based” records, the middle reported iron value is 0.5 mg per 100 grams. The central records run from 0.3 mg to 0.7 mg, while the complete observed span is 0.3 mg to 0.7 mg.

Soup, potato is nearest the lower central boundary, and Soup, French onion is nearest the upper central boundary. These are reference positions in this corpus, not labels of overall food quality.

Preparation language in the records

Source descriptions reveal meaningful distinctions.

The counts below report words and phrases that appear explicitly in the 13 USDA descriptions. They can help narrow a search to a closer record. They do not prove that the named preparation caused a nutrient difference, because these survey-food records are not controlled experiments.

No preparation phrase from the wiki’s controlled vocabulary appears consistently enough to summarize this topic. Use the exact record catalog instead of inferring a shared method.

Portion context

Household measures answer a different question than 100 grams.

13 of 13 records (100%) include at least one named measure in the source data. Together those records provide 33 usable named measures.

Across the pooled named measures, the midpoint gram weight is 440 g. The central 10th-to-90th-percentile interval runs from 247 g to 525 g, while the complete observed span is 245–525 g. This pooled summary mixes different measure types, so it is a navigation aid rather than a suggested portion.

A cup, slice, piece, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can represent a different amount of food. Even two measures with the same label may have different gram weights across records. Open the closest profile and use its listed weight instead of transferring a measure from another record.

USDA’s representative source amount is also not necessarily what a visitor ate. For equal-weight comparison, use the 100-gram table. For meal estimation, match the exact description first, then match the amount, and finally account for additions or preparation details absent from the selected record.

Common named measures in this topic

Choosing a closer record

Use a sequence, not a guess disguised as precision.

  1. 01

    Match the exact description

    Look for the closest food name, preparation, additions, and context. “Soups, cream-based” is the collection label; the individual description is the actual reference.

  2. 02

    Compare on equal weight

    Use the per-100-gram values when comparing two records. This keeps the denominator fixed and prevents different source-serving weights from masquerading as a food difference.

  3. 03

    Scale the closest listed measure

    Open the profile, select a named household measure when one fits, or enter a gram estimate. Treat scaled decimals as arithmetic from the source—not greater certainty about the plate.

  4. 04

    Add missing context

    Brand, recipe, cooking fat, sauce, toppings, substitutions, and edible portion can move the result. A current package label or weighed recipe may be more specific than a generic survey-food record.

Complete source catalog

All 13 “Soups, cream-based” records

Records are alphabetical, not ranked. Every row links to a complete Feast profile with household measures, all reported nutrients, estimate factors, and methodology, plus the exact USDA FoodData Central source where available.

Exact USDA descriptionCaloriesProteinFiberSodiumSource amountReferences
Soup, bisqueFDC 2707140 75 kcalper 100 g 2.3 gper 100 g 0.9 gper 100 g 239 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, broccoli cheeseFDC 2709659 82 kcalper 100 g 4.3 gper 100 g 1.3 gper 100 g 329 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, cream of chickenFDC 2707137 91 kcalper 100 g 4 gper 100 g 0.9 gper 100 g 251 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, cream of mushroomFDC 2710107 74 kcalper 100 g 2.1 gper 100 g 1.2 gper 100 g 242 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, cream of tomatoFDC 2709758 70 kcalper 100 g 1.2 gper 100 g 1 gper 100 g 246 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, cream of vegetableFDC 2710109 78 kcalper 100 g 1.4 gper 100 g 1.1 gper 100 g 245 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, French onionFDC 2710108 108 kcalper 100 g 5.5 gper 100 g 1.1 gper 100 g 378 mgper 100 g 245 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, New England clam chowderFDC 2707139 93 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 1 gper 100 g 247 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, peanutFDC 2707547 88 kcalper 100 g 3.2 gper 100 g 1.7 gper 100 g 246 mgper 100 g 245 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, pepperpotFDC 2707126 91 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 0.9 gper 100 g 251 mgper 100 g 245 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, potatoFDC 2709556 90 kcalper 100 g 1.5 gper 100 g 1.2 gper 100 g 240 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, potato with meatFDC 2709557 109 kcalper 100 g 3.8 gper 100 g 1 gper 100 g 246 mgper 100 g 255 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Soup, pumpkinFDC 2709718 72 kcalper 100 g 1.1 gper 100 g 1.5 gper 100 g 241 mgper 100 g 245 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗

Boundaries and provenance

What this collection can—and cannot—tell you.

This page summarizes USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) records from 2021–2023, published 2024-10-31. FNDDS supplies standardized reference descriptions used to represent foods reported in dietary surveys. Each value on this page remains tied to one exact FDC record; the complete catalog provides direct links so the source can be checked rather than taken on trust.

The records are not laboratory measurements of every possible “Soups, cream-based” preparation. Restaurant recipes change, packaged products are reformulated, homemade ingredient ratios vary, and cooking can change water weight. A photo also cannot reliably reveal every hidden ingredient or gram weight. The robust range describes variation among the records selected for this topic, not uncertainty around a single meal.

The median is not a default calorie count. The 10th and 90th percentiles are not lower and upper recommendations. The minimum and maximum are not promises that every real version falls inside the observed span. These statistics are tools for navigating a source collection while keeping the denominator, record name, and normal recipe variation visible.

Nutrient values do not establish whether a food is appropriate for a particular person or condition. This wiki does not diagnose deficiencies, prescribe targets, or replace advice from a qualified professional. If accuracy matters for an allergy, medical diet, or clinician-directed limit, use verified ingredient information and the guidance relevant to that situation.

Why no overall ranking appears.

A record can report more protein and also differ in sodium, fiber, energy, fat, portion weight, or ingredients. Choosing one metric as a universal score would hide those tradeoffs and imply a value judgment the data cannot support. The alphabetical catalog and side-by-side statistics are intentionally descriptive.

For the full import, filtering, portion-scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules, read Feast’s nutrition-page methodology. For an exact item, use its profile and FoodData Central link rather than citing this collection-level summary alone.

Common questions

Using the “Soups, cream-based” collection responsibly

Is the median the expected nutrition for my food?

No. It is the middle value among these 13 source records on a 100-gram basis. Your recipe, brand, preparation, and portion may align more closely with one specific record or may fall outside this collection.

Why compare 100 grams instead of one serving?

Source servings can have different gram weights and measure labels. Holding weight at 100 grams makes concentration comparable. After choosing a record, its household measures are more useful for estimating the amount actually eaten.

Does the upper end of a nutrient range mean “better”?

No. The position only describes that nutrient within this source collection. It does not evaluate the whole food, determine an appropriate portion, or account for an individual’s needs.

Which number should I log?

Start with the record whose exact wording most closely matches the food. Use a listed measure or gram estimate, then add missing recipe or preparation context. Keep the result as an estimate unless you have a current label or weighed recipe.