Pizza with extra meat: extra vegetables medium vs thin USDA FDC 2708668 vs 2708657
Per 100 g, extra vegetables medium reports 9.3 g total fat, while thin reports 13.4 g total fat.
The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.
Record A · FDC 2708668
Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust
Check this record in FoodData Central ↗Highlighted difference
Calories at the same 100-gram weight
Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.
-
233 kcal - Pizza with extra meat, thin crust 277 kcal
277 kcal
Shared basis: 100 g · kcal
Equal-weight evidence
Nutrition per 100 grams
Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.
On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Nutrient | A · Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables… | B · Pizza with extra meat, thin crust | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaloriesMaterial difference | 233 kcal | 277 kcal | B +44 kcal |
| ProteinMaterial difference | 11.4 g | 14.7 g | B +3.3 g |
| Total fatMaterial difference | 9.3 g | 13.4 g | B +4.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 26 g | 24.2 g | A +1.8 g |
| Dietary fiber | 2 g | 1.7 g | A +0.3 g |
| Total sugars | 3.1 g | 2.7 g | A +0.4 g |
| Sodium | 473 mg | 582 mg | B +109 mg |
| Saturated fatMaterial difference | 4 g | 5.6 g | B +1.6 g |
| Potassium | 194 mg | 213 mg | B +19 mg |
| Calcium | 147 mg | 140 mg | A +7 mg |
| Iron | 2.3 mg | 2.2 mg | A +0.1 mg |
Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.
Read the table by question
Every material primary-nutrient difference on this page is numerically higher in B (3 of 3).
These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.
Which reports fewer calories?
Record A
Record A reports 233 kcal, compared with 277 kcal in the other record—a difference of 44 kcal.
Which reports more protein?
Record B
Record B reports 14.7 g, compared with 11.4 g in the other record—a difference of 3.3 g.
Which reports more fiber?
Record A
Record A reports 2 g, compared with 1.7 g in the other record—a difference of 0.3 g.
Which reports less sodium?
Record A
Record A reports 473 mg, compared with 582 mg in the other record—a difference of 109 mg.
What differs in the source descriptions
The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.
USDA assigns both records to “Pizza,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust.” Record B is “Pizza with extra meat, thin crust.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are closely related (75% token overlap after controlled modifiers are set aside), not merely because they share a generic category.
The controlled name parser found 1 interpretable distinction. These labels organize wording already present in the names; they do not establish that a distinction caused a nutrient difference.
| Description dimension | Record A | Record B |
|---|---|---|
| Crust wording | medium crust | thin crust |
Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.
Portion context
A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”
Record A uses USDA reference amount at 318 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 240 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.
The two representative amounts differ by 78 g (25% of the larger amount). This is why the main table holds mass at 100 g. After selecting the closer description, use its household measure or a gram estimate for the amount actually eaten.
A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.
Record A measures
- 1 piece, NFS159 g
- 1 piece, small pizza107 g
- 1 piece, medium pizza117 g
- 1 piece, large pizza159 g
- 1 piece, extra-large pizza169 g
- 1 personal size pizza (5-7" diameter)235 g
- 1 small pizza (8-10" diameter)641 g
- 1 medium pizza (11-12" diameter)933 g
Record B measures
- 1 piece, NFS120 g
- 1 piece, small pizza81 g
- 1 piece, medium pizza90 g
- 1 piece, large pizza120 g
- 1 piece, extra-large pizza125 g
- 1 personal size pizza (5-7" diameter)175 g
- 1 small pizza (8-10" diameter)487 g
- 1 medium pizza (11-12" diameter)720 g
One shared household label
1 medium pizza (11-12" diameter): 933 g in A vs 720 g in B
The household label matches, but the source gram weights differ. These values scale each record by its own listed grams; they are practical portion context, not an equal-mass comparison.
| Nutrient | A · 933 g | B · 720 g |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 2,174 kcal | 1,994 kcal |
| Protein | 106.4 g | 105.8 g |
| Dietary fiber | 18.7 g | 12.2 g |
| Sodium | 4,413 mg | 4,190 mg |
USDA source formulation evidence
The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.
FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned, Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, breast, meat only, Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient. Record B’s include Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned, Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, breast, meat only, Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced. Ingredient-code overlap is 44%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 17%.
Record A · 8 coded inputs
Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust
- Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crustIngredient code 21299 · open source index74.8% of listed input weight
- Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-brownedIngredient code 23570 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
- Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, breast, meat onlyIngredient code 5000 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
- Green pepper, cooked, as ingredientIngredient code 99997520 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
- Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredientIngredient code 99997515 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
- Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large)Ingredient code 9193 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
- Onions, cooked, as ingredientIngredient code 99997510 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
- Sausage, Italian, pork, mild, cooked, pan-friedIngredient code 7089 · open source index3.6% of listed input weight
Record B · 5 coded inputs
Pizza with extra meat, thin crust
- Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crustIngredient code 21299 · open source index72.1% of listed input weight
- Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-brownedIngredient code 23570 · open source index7% of listed input weight
- Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, breast, meat onlyIngredient code 5000 · open source index7% of listed input weight
- Pepperoni, beef and pork, slicedIngredient code 7057 · open source index7% of listed input weight
- Sausage, Italian, pork, mild, cooked, pan-friedIngredient code 7089 · open source index7% of listed input weight
4 shared coded inputs
The largest shared entries include Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned, Chicken, broiler, rotisserie, BBQ, breast, meat only, Sausage, Italian, pork, mild, cooked, pan-fried. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.
4 A-only and 1 B-only coded inputs
A-only entries include Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredient, Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large), Onions, cooked, as ingredient. B-only entries include Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced.
Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.
- NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.
Choosing the closer record
Match context first; scale second.
- 01
Read both names literally
Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.
- 02
Use listed inputs as a check
If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.
- 03
Choose an amount for that record
After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.
- 04
Account for missing details
Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.
Limits and responsible interpretation
This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.
The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.
For this pair, the source names differ across 1 documented description dimension, while the listed formulations show 44% ingredient-code overlap and 17% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.
A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.
This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.
How this page qualified
A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.
Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.
For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.
Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.
Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
Turn source data into a better next decision
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust versus Pizza with extra meat, thin crust. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Pizza with extra meat, thin crust is higher in calories per 100 g
Pizza with extra meat, thin crust reports 277 kcal versus 233 kcal for Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust: a 44 kcal difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThe denominator changes the answer
Pizza with extra meat, thin crust is denser; Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust is higher in its source amount
Pizza with extra meat, thin crust reports 277 kcal per 100 g and 665 kcal in USDA source amount (240 g). Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust reports a lower 233 kcal per 100 g but a higher 741 kcal in USDA source amount (318 g).
Record identity is part of the estimate
Distinguish “Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust” from “Pizza with extra meat, thin crust”
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
Follow the relationship that matches your question
For Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust versus Pizza with extra meat, thin crust, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Best next guide for this exact record Pizza with extra meatPizza with extra meat, thin crust is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, calories runs from 233 kcal in Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust to 277 kcal in Pizza with extra meat, thin crust, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Green pepper, cooked, as ingredientUSDA input 99997520 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 46–46 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredientUSDA input 99997515 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 46–46 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust vs Pizza with meat and vegetables, from frozen, thin crustPizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, medium crust is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: No matching controlled term in the source name versus frozen; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Pizza with extra meat and extra vegetables, thick crust vs Pizza with extra meat, thin crustPizza with extra meat, thin crust is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Crust wording: thick crust versus thin crust; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path