French fries and other fried white potatoes100 g vs 100 gTwo cited FDC recordsUpdated

Potato, home fries: fresh vs restaurant fast food USDA FDC 2709474 vs 2709473

Per 100 g, fresh reports 279 mg sodium, while restaurant fast food reports 396 mg sodium.

The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.

Record A · FDC 2709474

Potato, home fries, from fresh

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Record B · FDC 2709473

Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Highlighted difference

Calories at the same 100-gram weight

Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.

  1. 185 kcal
  2. 213 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kcal

Equal-weight evidence

Nutrition per 100 grams

Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.

On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Per-100-gram nutrient comparison for Potato, home fries, from fresh and Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food
NutrientA · Potato, home fries, from freshB · Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast…Difference
CaloriesMaterial difference 185 kcal 213 kcal B +28 kcal
Protein 2 g 1.9 g A +0.1 g
Total fatMaterial difference 11.5 g 15.2 g B +3.7 g
Carbohydrate 18.8 g 17.9 g A +0.9 g
Dietary fiber 1.6 g 1.6 g Same reported value
Total sugars 1.3 g 1.2 g A +0.1 g
SodiumMaterial difference 279 mg 396 mg B +117 mg
Saturated fatMaterial difference 1.6 g 5 g B +3.4 g
Potassium 407 mg 388 mg A +19 mg
Calcium 9 mg 9 mg Same reported value
Iron 0.7 mg 0.6 mg No difference at displayed precision

Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.

Read the table by question

Every material primary-nutrient difference on this page is numerically higher in B (3 of 3).

These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.

Which reports fewer calories?

Record A

Record A reports 185 kcal, compared with 213 kcal in the other record—a difference of 28 kcal.

Which reports more protein?

Record A

Record A reports 2 g, compared with 1.9 g in the other record—a difference of 0.1 g.

Which reports more fiber?

Same reported value

Both records report 1.6 g of fiber per 100 g.

Which reports less sodium?

Record A

Record A reports 279 mg, compared with 396 mg in the other record—a difference of 117 mg.

What differs in the source descriptions

The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.

USDA assigns both records to “French fries and other fried white potatoes,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Potato, home fries, from fresh.” Record B is “Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are an exact match, not merely because they share a generic category.

The controlled name parser found 2 interpretable distinctions. These labels organize wording already present in the names; they do not establish that a distinction caused a nutrient difference.

Controlled wording distinctions
Description dimensionRecord ARecord B
Source formfreshNo matching controlled term in the source name
Source contextNo matching controlled term in the source namerestaurant or fast food

Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.

Portion context

A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”

Record A uses USDA reference amount at 100 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 100 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.

The representative amounts do not cross Feast’s material portion-difference threshold of both 15 grams and 20%. They are still separate source measures, so the 100-gram table remains the appropriate place for an equal-weight comparison.

A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.

Record A measures

  • 1 cup200 g
  • 1 potato, any size100 g
  • USDA reference amount100 g
Scale record A →

One shared household label

1 cup: 200 g in A vs 200 g in B

Here the household label and listed gram weight match at displayed precision, so this particular table is also an equal-mass comparison. The values remain specific to these two source records, not a universal weight for every 1 cup.

Nutrition for one 1 cup using each record’s own source gram weight
NutrientA · 200 gB · 200 g
Calories370 kcal426 kcal
Protein3.9 g3.7 g
Dietary fiber3.2 g3.2 g
Sodium558 mg792 mg

USDA source formulation evidence

The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.

FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Potatoes, baked, flesh and skin, without salt, Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt, Vegetable oil, NFS, Salt, table. Record B’s include Potatoes, baked, flesh and skin, without salt, Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt, Industrial oil as ingredient in food, Salt, table. Ingredient-code overlap is 60%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 15%.

3 shared coded inputs

The largest shared entries include Potatoes, baked, flesh and skin, without salt, Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt, Salt, table. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.

1 A-only and 1 B-only coded inputs

A-only entries include Vegetable oil, NFS. B-only entries include Industrial oil as ingredient in food.

Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Choosing the closer record

Match context first; scale second.

  1. 01

    Read both names literally

    Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.

  2. 02

    Use listed inputs as a check

    If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.

  3. 03

    Choose an amount for that record

    After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.

  4. 04

    Account for missing details

    Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.

Limits and responsible interpretation

This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.

The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.

For this pair, the source names differ across 2 documented description dimensions, while the listed formulations show 60% ingredient-code overlap and 15% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.

A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.

This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.

How this page qualified

A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.

Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.

For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.

Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.

Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Potato, home fries, from fresh versus Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food is higher in calories per 100 g

Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food reports 213 kcal versus 185 kcal for Potato, home fries, from fresh: a 28 kcal difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

2 listed servings each weigh 100 g

The 2 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 100 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Potato, home fries, from fresh” from “Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Potato, home fries, from fresh versus Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Potato, home fries

Potato, home fries, from fresh and Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
2 exact records carried forward Potato

Potato, home fries, from fresh and Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 185 kcal in Potato, home fries, from fresh to 213 kcal in Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Industrial oil as ingredient in food

USDA input 99998210 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 18–18 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Vegetable oil, NFS

USDA input 82101000 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 13–13 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Potato, home fries, from fresh vs Potato, home fries, with vegetables

Potato, home fries, from fresh is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: fresh versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic French fries and other fried white potatoes

Potato, home fries, from fresh and Potato, home fries, from restaurant / fast food belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path