Sandwiches, burgers & wrapshigher variability

Chicken fillet biscuit, fast food calories: 496 per 1 sandwich (155 g)

This exact USDA record reports 496 calories for 1 sandwich (155 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Exact USDA description: Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food

Quick facts

1 sandwich · 155 g

Calories
496 kcal
Protein
16.7 g
Carbohydrate
40.9 g
Total fat
29.6 g
Fiber
3.1 g
Sodium
1,201 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 sandwich, any size · 155 g

496calories

Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food

Protein
16.7 g
Carbs
40.9 g
Fat
29.6 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2707002

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 496 calories for 1 sandwich at 155 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 320 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 16.7 g protein, 3.1 g fiber, and 1,201 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is chicken tenders, breaded, frozen, prepared, representing 52.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 4 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 sandwich at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2707002: “Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2707002, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 116.3 g 372 kcal 12.6 g 2.3 g 901 mg
1 sandwich, any sizeUSDA-listed household measure 155 g 496 kcal 16.7 g 3.1 g 1,201 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 193.8 g 620 kcal 20.9 g 3.9 g 1,502 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Chicken fillet sandwiches

The comparison set contains 20 exact records in the Chicken fillet sandwiches USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2707002’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

320 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
258 kcal
Middle 50%
241–280 kcal

Based on 20 records reporting energy.

Protein

lower quarter

10.8 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
13.4 g
Middle 50%
12.6–21.4 g

Based on 20 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.7 g
Middle 50%
1.2–2 g

Based on 20 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

upper quarter

775 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
504 mg
Middle 50%
469–572 mg

Based on 20 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2707002’s 155 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron3 mg

≈ 14% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Dietary fiber3.1 g

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat11.8 g

≈ 59% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium1,201 mg

≈ 52% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2707003 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 155 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 116.3–193.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 372 kcal and 620 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2707003

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 5.6 g more total fat than “Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, from fast food.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Chicken tenders, breaded, frozen, prepared

    The source formulation has 4 input rows; Chicken tenders, breaded, frozen, prepared supplies 52.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “from fast food” fits. Inspect FDC 2707003 when “fried; from fast food” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food

Exact source wording
“Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2707002 · FNDDS 27540145
Named qualifiers
from fast food
Source inputs unique in this pair
Biscuit, from fast food / restaurant

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, from fast food

Exact source wording
“Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, from fast food”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2707003 · FNDDS 27540146
Named qualifiers
fried · from fast food
Source inputs unique in this pair
Rolls, hamburger or hotdog, plain

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “from fast food”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordChicken fillet biscuit, from fast food 155 g496 kcal 320 kcal 10.8 g 19.1 g 2 g 775 mg
Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, from fast food 140 g393 kcal 281 kcal 12.2 g 13.5 g 1.7 g 571 mg
Chicken fillet sandwich, grilled, from fast food 140 g316 kcal 226 kcal 21.5 g 6.2 g 0.7 g 430 mg
Chicken fillet wrap sandwich, fried, from fast food 161 g481 kcal 299 kcal 12.7 g 16.7 g 2 g 694 mg
Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, from fast food, with cheese 161 g469 kcal 291 kcal 13.2 g 15.3 g 1.5 g 626 mg
Chicken fillet sandwich, NS as to fried or grilled, from fast food 140 g393 kcal 281 kcal 12.2 g 13.5 g 1.7 g 571 mg
Chicken fillet wrap sandwich, grilled, from fast food 161 g406 kcal 252 kcal 20.8 g 10.4 g 1.2 g 574 mg

How to compare FDC 2707002: its source amount is 155 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2707002, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 sandwich, any size

496 kcal

155 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2707002, Saturated fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Saturated fat

11.8 g≈ 59% Daily Value

Sodium

1,201.3 mg≈ 52% Daily Value

Total fat

29.6 g≈ 38% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2707002’s 155 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2707002 at 155 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 3.1 g dietary fiber, about 11% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 1201 mg sodium, about 52% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 155 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 496 kcal Not established
Protein 16.7 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 40.9 g 15%
Total fat 29.6 g 38%
Dietary fiber 3.1 g 11%
Sugars 3.1 g Not established
Sodium 1,201.3 mg 52%
Saturated fat 11.8 g 59%
Monounsaturated Fat 6.8 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 8.4 g Not established
Cholesterol 31 mg 10%
Potassium 317.8 mg 7%
Calcium 79.1 mg 6%
Iron 2.5 mg 14%
Magnesium 34.1 mg 8%
Vitamin C 0.5 mg 1%
Vitamin D 0.2 µg 1%
Vitamin A 18.6 µg 2%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 63.6 g Not established

For FDC 2707002, approximate percentages divide the displayed 155 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2707002 to 4 source inputs totaling 161.3 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

4 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Chicken tenders, breaded, frozen, prepared, Biscuit, from fast food / restaurant, Industrial oil as ingredient in food. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

161.3 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Biscuit, from fast food / restaurantUSDA ingredient 52103000 70 GM 70 g 43.4%
2 Chicken tenders, breaded, frozen, preparedUSDA ingredient 22978 · encyclopedia page available 85 GM 85 g 52.7%
3 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.3 GM 0.3 g 0.2%
4 Industrial oil as ingredient in foodUSDA ingredient 99998210 · encyclopedia page available 6 GM 6 g 3.7%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2707002, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Chicken fillet sandwiches” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories320 kcal281 kcal+39 kcal
Protein10.8 g12.2 g−1.4 g
Carbohydrate26.4 g27.5 g−1.1 g
Total fat19.1 g13.5 g+5.6 g
Dietary fiber2 g1.7 g+0.3 g
Sodium775 mg571 mg+204 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 39 more calories, 1.4 g less protein, and 5.6 g more total fat than “Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, from fast food.”

Only this record lists Biscuit, from fast food / restaurant. Only the comparison record lists Rolls, hamburger or hotdog, plain. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

4 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Chicken tenders, breaded, frozen, prepared; Salt, table; Industrial oil as ingredient in food.

Listed only in this record: Biscuit, from fast food / restaurant.

Listed only in the comparison: Rolls, hamburger or hotdog, plain.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 155 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 sandwich (155 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 140 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular sandwich (140 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2707002 with FDC 2707003 at equal mass; use their 155 g and 140 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2707002 versus FDC 2707003 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full chicken fillet sandwiches source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with restaurant formulation and serving size, item size, bread or wrapper size, fillings.

For “Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food,” resolve restaurant formulation and serving size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    restaurant formulation and serving size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    item size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  3. 03

    bread or wrapper size

    Resolve bread or wrapper size only when the meal or its source gives you evidence. If it is unknown, leave the uncertainty visible instead of choosing the most convenient variant.

  4. 04

    fillings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2707002 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 320 kcal per 100 g becomes 496 kcal at 155 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 sandwich has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2707002

FNDDS food code: 27540145

The scaling for FDC 2707002 can be exact while the match to “Chicken fillet biscuit, from fast food” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 155 g weight, 4-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.