Fish & seafoodmoderate variability

Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style calories: 153 per 90 g

This exact USDA record reports 153 calories for 90 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 90 g

Calories
153 kcal
Protein
8.7 g
Carbohydrate
5 g
Total fat
10.8 g
Fiber
0.9 g
Sodium
116 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 90 g

153calories

Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style

Protein
8.7 g
Carbs
5 g
Fat
10.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706870

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 153 calories for USDA reference amount at 90 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 170 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 8.7 g protein, 0.9 g fiber, and 116 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is mollusks, octopus, common, raw, representing 43.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 6 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 153–306 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706870: “Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706870, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 67.5 g 115 kcal 6.5 g 0.7 g 87 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 90 g 153 kcal 8.7 g 0.9 g 116 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 180 g 306 kcal 17.4 g 1.8 g 232 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Seafood mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 94 exact records in the Seafood mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2706870’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

170 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
101–170 kcal

Based on 94 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

9.7 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
9.3 g
Middle 50%
7.1–10.7 g

Based on 94 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.7 g
Middle 50%
0.4–1 g

Based on 94 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

129 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
347 mg
Middle 50%
268–453 mg

Based on 94 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706870’s 90 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron3 mg

≈ 17% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin C8 mg

≈ 9% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat1.7 g

≈ 9% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium116 mg

≈ 5% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706871 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 90 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 67.5–112.5 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 115 kcal and 191 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706871

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 286 mg less sodium than “Codfish salad, Puerto Rican style, Serenata.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Mollusks, octopus, common, raw

    The source formulation has 6 input rows; Mollusks, octopus, common, raw supplies 43.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “Puerto Rican style” fits. Inspect FDC 2706871 when “Puerto Rican style; Serenata” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style

Exact source wording
“Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706870 · FNDDS 27451060
Named qualifiers
Puerto Rican style
Source inputs unique in this pair
Mollusks, octopus, common, raw · Spices, pepper, black

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Codfish salad, Puerto Rican style, Serenata

Exact source wording
“Codfish salad, Puerto Rican style, Serenata”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706871 · FNDDS 27451070
Named qualifiers
Puerto Rican style · Serenata
Source inputs unique in this pair
Fish, cod, Atlantic, canned, solids and liquid · Salt, table · Olives, pickled, canned or bottled, green

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “Puerto Rican style”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordOctopus salad, Puerto Rican style 90 g153 kcal 170 kcal 9.7 g 12 g 1 g 129 mg
Codfish salad, Puerto Rican style, Serenata 72 g132 kcal 183 kcal 6.6 g 15.9 g 0.7 g 415 mg
Lobster with sauce, Puerto Rican style 121 g186 kcal 154 kcal 10.8 g 10.6 g 0.9 g 719 mg
Biscayne codfish, Puerto Rican style 88 g167 kcal 190 kcal 9.2 g 12.2 g 1.9 g 300 mg
Stewed salmon, Puerto Rican style 106 g155 kcal 146 kcal 12 g 7 g 1.3 g 448 mg
Fried fish with sauce, Puerto Rican style 135 g209 kcal 155 kcal 11.8 g 10.3 g 0.8 g 662 mg
Codfish with starchy vegetables, Puerto Rican style 86 g116 kcal 135 kcal 3.5 g 5.4 g 2.7 g 54 mg

How to compare FDC 2706870: its source amount is 90 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706870, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

306 kcal

180 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706870, Iron is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Iron

3 mg≈ 17% Daily Value

Total fat

10.8 g≈ 14% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706870’s 90 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706870 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 8.7 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 90 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 153 kcal Not established
Protein 8.7 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 5 g 2%
Total fat 10.8 g 14%
Dietary fiber 0.9 g 3%
Sugars 1.9 g Not established
Sodium 116.1 mg 5%
Saturated fat 1.7 g 9%
Monounsaturated Fat 7 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 1.1 g Not established
Cholesterol 26.1 mg 9%
Potassium 267.3 mg 6%
Calcium 39.6 mg 3%
Iron 3 mg 17%
Magnesium 21.6 mg 5%
Vitamin C 8 mg 9%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 34.2 µg 4%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 64.2 g Not established

For FDC 2706870, approximate percentages divide the displayed 90 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706870 to 6 source inputs totaling 517.8 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

6 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Mollusks, octopus, common, raw, Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average, Onions, raw. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

517.8 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Mollusks, octopus, common, rawUSDA ingredient 15166 0.5 LB 226.8 g 43.8%
2 Onions, rawUSDA ingredient 11282 · encyclopedia page available 110 GM 110 g 21.2%
3 Spices, pepper, blackUSDA ingredient 2030 · encyclopedia page available 1 GM 1 g 0.2%
4 Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round averageUSDA ingredient 11529 · encyclopedia page available 123 GM 123 g 23.8%
5 Olive oilUSDA ingredient 82104000 · encyclopedia page available 3 TB 42 g 8.1%
6 Vinegar, ciderUSDA ingredient 2048 · encyclopedia page available 15 GM 15 g 2.9%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706870, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Seafood mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories170 kcal183 kcal−13 kcal
Protein9.7 g6.6 g+3.1 g
Carbohydrate5.6 g2.8 g+2.8 g
Total fat12 g15.9 g−3.9 g
Dietary fiber1 g0.7 g+0.3 g
Sodium129 mg415 mg−286 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 13 less calories, 3.1 g more protein, and 2.8 g more carbohydrate than “Codfish salad, Puerto Rican style, Serenata.”

Only this record lists Mollusks, octopus, common, raw; Spices, pepper, black. Only the comparison record lists Fish, cod, Atlantic, canned, solids and liquid; Salt, table; Olives, pickled, canned or bottled, green. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Onions, raw; Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average; Olive oil; Vinegar, cider.

Listed only in this record: Mollusks, octopus, common, raw; Spices, pepper, black.

Listed only in the comparison: Fish, cod, Atlantic, canned, solids and liquid; Salt, table; Olives, pickled, canned or bottled, green.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 90 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (180 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 72 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (145 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706870 with FDC 2706871 at equal mass; use their 90 g and 72 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706870 versus FDC 2706871 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full seafood mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, species or cut, cooking method, breading, butter, or sauce.

For “Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    species or cut

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    breading, butter, or sauce

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706870 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 170 kcal per 100 g becomes 153 kcal at 90 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706870

FNDDS food code: 27451060

The scaling for FDC 2706870 can be exact while the match to “Octopus salad, Puerto Rican style” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 90 g weight, 6-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.