Pizza100 g vs 100 gTwo cited FDC recordsUpdated

Pizza: with cheese and extra vs cheese with vegetables USDA FDC 2708630 vs 2708625

Per 100 g, with cheese and extra reports 221 calories, while cheese with vegetables reports 253 calories.

The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.

Record A · FDC 2708630

Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Record B · FDC 2708625

Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Highlighted difference

Calories at the same 100-gram weight

Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.

  1. 221 kcal
  2. 253 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kcal

Equal-weight evidence

Nutrition per 100 grams

Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.

On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Per-100-gram nutrient comparison for Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust and Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust
NutrientA · Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables…B · Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen…Difference
CaloriesMaterial difference 221 kcal 253 kcal B +32 kcal
Protein 9.3 g 9.8 g B +0.5 g
Total fatMaterial difference 8.2 g 11.5 g B +3.3 g
Carbohydrate 27.6 g 27.7 g B +0.1 g
Dietary fiber 2.1 g 2.1 g Same reported value
Total sugars 3.4 g 3.6 g B +0.2 g
Sodium 463 mg 418 mg A +45 mg
Saturated fat 3.6 g 4 g B +0.4 g
Potassium 178 mg 153 mg A +25 mg
Calcium 154 mg 168 mg B +14 mg
Iron 2.3 mg 2.1 mg A +0.2 mg

Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.

Read the table by question

Every material primary-nutrient difference on this page is numerically higher in B (2 of 2).

These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.

Which reports fewer calories?

Record A

Record A reports 221 kcal, compared with 253 kcal in the other record—a difference of 32 kcal.

Which reports more protein?

Record B

Record B reports 9.8 g, compared with 9.3 g in the other record—a difference of 0.5 g.

Which reports more fiber?

Same reported value

Both records report 2.1 g of fiber per 100 g.

Which reports less sodium?

Record B

Record B reports 418 mg, compared with 463 mg in the other record—a difference of 45 mg.

What differs in the source descriptions

The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.

USDA assigns both records to “Pizza,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust.” Record B is “Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are closely related (75% token overlap after controlled modifiers are set aside), not merely because they share a generic category.

The controlled name parser found 2 interpretable distinctions. These labels organize wording already present in the names; they do not establish that a distinction caused a nutrient difference.

Controlled wording distinctions
Description dimensionRecord ARecord B
Source formNo matching controlled term in the source namefrozen
Crust wordingmedium crustthick crust

Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.

Portion context

A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”

Record A uses USDA reference amount at 304 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 286 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.

The representative amounts do not cross Feast’s material portion-difference threshold of both 15 grams and 20%. They are still separate source measures, so the 100-gram table remains the appropriate place for an equal-weight comparison.

A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.

Record A measures

  • 1 piece, NFS152 g
  • 1 piece, small pizza84 g
  • 1 piece, medium pizza108 g
  • 1 piece, large pizza152 g
  • 1 piece, extra-large pizza165 g
  • 1 personal size pizza (5-7" diameter)223 g
  • 1 small pizza (8-10" diameter)503 g
  • 1 medium pizza (11-12" diameter)861 g
Scale record A →

Record B measures

  • 1 piece, NFS143 g
  • 1 frozen personal size pizza (5-7" diameter)215 g
  • 1 frozen small pizza (8-10" diameter)483 g
  • 1 frozen medium pizza (11-13" diameter)859 g
  • 1 frozen large pizza (14-16" diameter)1,343 g
  • 1/2 bagel100 g
  • 1/2 English muffin58 g
  • 1 French bread165 g
Scale record B →

USDA source formulation evidence

The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.

FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredient, Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large), Onions, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. Record B’s include Pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, frozen, cooked, Onions, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, Peppers, sweet, green, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. Ingredient-code overlap is 33%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 93%.

Record A · 5 coded inputs

Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust

  1. 78.3% of listed input weight
  2. Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredientIngredient code 99997515 · open source index
    5.4% of listed input weight
  3. Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large)Ingredient code 9193 · open source index
    5.4% of listed input weight
  4. Onions, cooked, boiled, drained, without saltIngredient code 11283 · open source index
    5.4% of listed input weight
  5. Peppers, sweet, green, cooked, boiled, drained, without saltIngredient code 11334 · open source index
    5.4% of listed input weight

2 shared coded inputs

The largest shared entries include Onions, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, Peppers, sweet, green, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.

3 A-only and 1 B-only coded inputs

A-only entries include Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredient, Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large). B-only entries include Pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, frozen, cooked.

Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Choosing the closer record

Match context first; scale second.

  1. 01

    Read both names literally

    Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.

  2. 02

    Use listed inputs as a check

    If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.

  3. 03

    Choose an amount for that record

    After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.

  4. 04

    Account for missing details

    Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.

Limits and responsible interpretation

This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.

The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.

For this pair, the source names differ across 2 documented description dimensions, while the listed formulations show 33% ingredient-code overlap and 93% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.

A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.

This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.

How this page qualified

A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.

Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.

For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.

Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.

Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust versus Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust is higher in calories per 100 g

Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust reports 253 kcal versus 221 kcal for Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust: a 32 kcal difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust is denser; Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust is higher in its source amount

Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust reports 9.8 g per 100 g and 27.9 g in USDA source amount (286 g). Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust reports a lower 9.3 g per 100 g but a higher 28.2 g in USDA source amount (304 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust” from “Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust versus Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables

Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust vs Pizza, cheese, with vegetables, from restaurant or fast food, thin crust

Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: frozen versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 221 kcal in Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust to 253 kcal in Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Fast Food, Pizza Chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust

USDA input 21299 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 954–954 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Mushrooms, cooked, as ingredient

USDA input 99997515 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 66–66 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust vs Pizza, extra cheese, thin crust

Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Crust wording: medium crust versus thin crust; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic Pizza

Pizza with cheese and extra vegetables, medium crust and Pizza, cheese with vegetables, from frozen, thick crust belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path