Energy
middle half269 kcalthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 258 kcal
- Middle 50%
- 241–280 kcal
Based on 20 records reporting energy.
Sandwiches, burgers & wrapshigher variability
Chicken salad sandwich wrap calories: 538 per 1 sandwich (200 g)
This exact USDA record reports 538 calories for 1 sandwich (200 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.
Quick facts
1 sandwich · 200 g
- Calories
- 538 kcal
- Protein
- 25.8 g
- Carbohydrate
- 34 g
- Total fat
- 33.2 g
- Fiber
- 2.6 g
- Sodium
- 1,206 mg
Portion calculator
Estimate your portion
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 sandwich, any size · 200 g
538calories
Chicken salad sandwich wrap
- Protein
- 25.8 g
- Carbs
- 34 g
- Fat
- 33.2 g
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources
The editorial read
The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity
Portion: the cited record reports about 538 calories for 1 sandwich at 200 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 269 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.
Composition: that source amount also reports 25.8 g protein, 2.6 g fiber, and 1,206 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.
Identity: the largest listed formulation input is chicken or turkey salad, made with mayonnaise, representing 59.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.
The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 sandwich at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.
Record-specific decision brief
What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you
This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706992: “Chicken salad sandwich wrap.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.
01 · Portion arithmetic
Three weights, one fixed composition
For FDC 2706992, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.
| Scenario | Weight | Energy | Protein | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 150 g | 404 kcal | 19.4 g | 2 g | 905 mg |
| 1 sandwich, any sizeUSDA-listed household measure | 200 g | 538 kcal | 25.8 g | 2.6 g | 1,206 mg |
| 125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 250 g | 673 kcal | 32.3 g | 3.3 g | 1,508 mg |
02 · Fixed-weight context
Where 100 grams sits inside Chicken fillet sandwiches
The comparison set contains 20 exact records in the Chicken fillet sandwiches USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2706992’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.
Protein
middle half12.9 gthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 13.4 g
- Middle 50%
- 12.6–21.4 g
Based on 20 records reporting protein.
Dietary fiber
middle half1.3 gthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 1.7 g
- Middle 50%
- 1.2–2 g
Based on 20 records reporting dietary fiber.
Sodium
upper quarter603 mgthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 504 mg
- Middle 50%
- 469–572 mg
Based on 20 records reporting sodium.
03 · FDA label lens
The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals
At FDC 2706992’s 200 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Calcium; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.
Strength-side signals
Calcium298 mg
≈ 23% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Iron3 mg
≈ 16% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Tradeoff-side signals
Sodium1,206 mg
≈ 52% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Saturated fat9 g
≈ 45% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
04 · Highest-impact checks
The three levers most worth resolving first
For “Chicken salad sandwich wrap,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706990 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.
- 01
Portion sensitivity around 200 g
A 25% weight move in either direction spans 150–250 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 404 kcal and 673 kcal.
- 02
Record choice: compare with FDC 2706990
At an equal 100 g, this record has 130 mg more sodium than “Chicken salad sandwich on white.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.
- 03
Formulation anchor: Chicken or turkey salad, made with mayonnaise
The source formulation has 3 input rows; Chicken or turkey salad, made with mayonnaise supplies 59.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.
05 · Exact-record choice
Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name
Keep this record when the exact wording “Chicken salad sandwich wrap” fits. Inspect FDC 2706990 when the exact wording “Chicken salad sandwich on white” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.
Keep this profile when these fields fit
Chicken salad sandwich wrap
- Exact source wording
- “Chicken salad sandwich wrap”
- Source identity
- USDA FDC 2706992 · FNDDS 27540122
- Source inputs unique in this pair
- Tortillas, ready-to-bake or -fry, flour, refrigerated · Cheese as ingredient in sandwiches
Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better
Chicken salad sandwich on white
- Exact source wording
- “Chicken salad sandwich on white”
- Source identity
- USDA FDC 2706990 · FNDDS 27540120
- Source inputs unique in this pair
- Bread, white, commercially prepared
Choose the closest description
Which USDA record fits your meal?
Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.
On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact record | Source serving | Calories / 100 g | Protein / 100 g | Fat / 100 g | Fiber / 100 g | Sodium / 100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This recordChicken salad sandwich wrap | 200 g538 kcal | 269 kcal | 12.9 g | 16.6 g | 1.3 g | 603 mg |
| Chicken salad sandwich on white | 180 g443 kcal | 246 kcal | 12.4 g | 13.7 g | 1 g | 473 mg |
| Chicken salad sandwich on wheat | 180 g441 kcal | 245 kcal | 13.1 g | 13.8 g | 2.1 g | 469 mg |
| Chicken fillet wrap sandwich, grilled, from fast food | 161 g406 kcal | 252 kcal | 20.8 g | 10.4 g | 1.2 g | 574 mg |
| Chicken fillet wrap sandwich, fried, from fast food | 161 g481 kcal | 299 kcal | 12.7 g | 16.7 g | 2 g | 694 mg |
| Chicken fillet sandwich, from school cafeteria | 92 g231 kcal | 251 kcal | 14.6 g | 8.1 g | 4.4 g | 446 mg |
| Chicken fillet sandwich, fried, on white bun | 140 g377 kcal | 269 kcal | 12.4 g | 11.7 g | 1.7 g | 503 mg |
How to compare FDC 2706992: its source amount is 200 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.
Household measures
Compare listed portions
For FDC 2706992, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.
1 sandwich, any size
538 kcal
200 g
At a glance
Nutrient signals in the source amount
For FDC 2706992, Sodium is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.
Sodium
1,206 mg≈ 52% Daily ValueSaturated fat
9 g≈ 45% Daily ValueThe percentages above apply to FDC 2706992’s 200 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗
Why FDC 2706992 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 25.8 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.
Source-serving signals
What stands out in this record
These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2706992 at 200 g—not a measured or recommended plate.
- The representative USDA portion contains 1206 mg sodium, about 52% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
Nutrition facts
Compare the source serving with 100 grams
Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 200 g.
| Nutrient | Amount | Approx. % Daily Value |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 538 kcal 269 kcal | Not established Not established |
| Protein | 25.8 g 12.9 g | Not shown Not shown |
| Carbohydrate | 34 g 17 g | 12% 6% |
| Total fat | 33.2 g 16.6 g | 43% 21% |
| Dietary fiber | 2.6 g 1.3 g | 9% 5% |
| Sugars | 5.3 g 2.7 g | Not established Not established |
| Sodium | 1,206 mg 603 mg | 52% 26% |
| Saturated fat | 9 g 4.5 g | 45% 23% |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 8.2 g 4.1 g | Not established Not established |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 13.2 g 6.6 g | Not established Not established |
| Cholesterol | 96 mg 48 mg | 32% 16% |
| Potassium | 354 mg 177 mg | 8% 4% |
| Calcium | 298 mg 149 mg | 23% 11% |
| Iron | 2.8 mg 1.4 mg | 16% 8% |
| Magnesium | 36 mg 18 mg | 9% 4% |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg 0.5 mg | 1% 1% |
| Vitamin D | 0.8 µg 0.4 µg | 4% 2% |
| Vitamin A | 76 µg 38 µg | 8% 4% |
| Caffeine | 0 mg 0 mg | Not established Not established |
| Alcohol | 0 g 0 g | Not established Not established |
| Water | 102.8 g 51.4 g | Not established Not established |
For FDC 2706992, approximate percentages divide the displayed 200 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.
Inside the source record
Source formulation behind this USDA record
USDA links FDC 2706992 to 3 source inputs totaling 201 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Chicken salad sandwich wrap” inspectable beside similarly named records.
How to read this
3 listed components
The largest listed inputs by source weight are Chicken or turkey salad, made with mayonnaise, Tortillas, ready-to-bake or -fry, flour, refrigerated, Cheese as ingredient in sandwiches. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.
201 g total listed input weight across the formulation.
| # | USDA input | Listed amount | Input weight | Share of listed input weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tortillas, ready-to-bake or -fry, flour, refrigeratedUSDA ingredient 18364 · encyclopedia page available | 60 GM | 60 g | 29.9% |
| 2 | Chicken or turkey salad, made with mayonnaiseUSDA ingredient 27446200 | 120 GM | 120 g | 59.7% |
| 3 | Cheese as ingredient in sandwichesUSDA ingredient 99991400 · encyclopedia page available | 21 GM | 21 g | 10.4% |
Exact-record context
What makes this USDA record distinct?
For FDC 2706992, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Chicken fillet sandwiches” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.
This record
Chicken salad sandwich wrap
- USDA category
- Chicken fillet sandwiches
- FDC ID
- 2706992
- FNDDS code
- 27540122
Closest inspectable record
Chicken salad sandwich on white
- USDA category
- Chicken fillet sandwiches
- FDC ID
- 2706990
- FNDDS code
- 27540120
| Nutrient | This record | Comparison record | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 269 kcal | 246 kcal | +23 kcal |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 12.4 g | +0.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 17 g | 18.3 g | −1.3 g |
| Total fat | 16.6 g | 13.7 g | +2.9 g |
| Dietary fiber | 1.3 g | 1 g | +0.3 g |
| Sodium | 603 mg | 473 mg | +130 mg |
Plain-English read
At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 23 more calories, 2.9 g more total fat, and 130 mg more sodium than “Chicken salad sandwich on white.”
Only this record lists Tortillas, ready-to-bake or -fry, flour, refrigerated; Cheese as ingredient in sandwiches. Only the comparison record lists Bread, white, commercially prepared. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.
3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.
Formulation evidence
The listed formulations differ
The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.
Shared listed inputs: Chicken or turkey salad, made with mayonnaise.
Listed only in this record: Tortillas, ready-to-bake or -fry, flour, refrigerated; Cheese as ingredient in sandwiches.
Listed only in the comparison: Bread, white, commercially prepared.
Portion evidence
The listed portion sets differ
This record’s reference amount is 200 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 sandwich (200 g).
The comparison record’s reference amount is 180 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular (180 g).
Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706992 with FDC 2706990 at equal mass; use their 200 g and 180 g source amounts only for portion matching.
Evidence boundary: FDC 2706992 versus FDC 2706990 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.
Review the full chicken fillet sandwiches source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →
Uncertainty, made actionable
What can change this estimate?
This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with item size, bread or wrapper size, fillings, sauces and cheese.
For “Chicken salad sandwich wrap,” resolve item size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.
- 01
item size
When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.
- 02
bread or wrapper size
Resolve bread or wrapper size only when the meal or its source gives you evidence. If it is unknown, leave the uncertainty visible instead of choosing the most convenient variant.
- 03
fillings
Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.
- 04
sauces and cheese
Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.
How we estimated this
The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point
FDC 2706992 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 269 kcal per 100 g becomes 538 kcal at 200 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.
About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 sandwich has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.
Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024
FoodData Central ID: 2706992
FNDDS food code: 27540122
The scaling for FDC 2706992 can be exact while the match to “Chicken salad sandwich wrap” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 200 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.
Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.