Mixed disheshigher variability

Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled calories: 326 per 1 chili (143 g)

This exact USDA record reports 326 calories for 1 chili (143 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 chili · 143 g

Calories
326 kcal
Protein
11.2 g
Carbohydrate
14.9 g
Total fat
24.6 g
Fiber
1 g
Sodium
636 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 chili · 143 g

326calories

Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled

Protein
11.2 g
Carbs
14.9 g
Fat
24.6 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710043

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 326 calories for 1 chili at 143 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 228 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 11.2 g protein, 1 g fiber, and 636 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, representing 43.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 5 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 chili at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 326–401 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2710043: “Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2710043, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 107.3 g 245 kcal 8.4 g 0.8 g 477 mg
1 chiliUSDA-listed household measure 143 g 326 kcal 11.2 g 1 g 636 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 176 g 401 kcal 13.8 g 1.2 g 783 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Other Mexican mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 41 exact records in the Other Mexican mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2710043’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

228 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
228 kcal
Middle 50%
174–269 kcal

Based on 41 records reporting energy.

Protein

lower quarter

7.8 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
11.2 g
Middle 50%
8.1–12.5 g

Based on 41 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

lower quarter

0.7 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
2.1 g
Middle 50%
1.5–2.9 g

Based on 41 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

445 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
451 mg
Middle 50%
345–490 mg

Based on 41 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2710043’s 143 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C57 mg

≈ 63% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Calcium290 mg

≈ 22% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat8.7 g

≈ 44% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium636 mg

≈ 28% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2710044 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 chili to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 143 g and 176 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 326 kcal to 401 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2710044

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.2 g less protein than “Chiles rellenos, filled with meat and cheese.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient

    The source formulation has 5 input rows; Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient supplies 43.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “cheese-filled” fits. Inspect FDC 2710044 when “filled with meat and cheese” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled

Exact source wording
“Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2710043 · FNDDS 75410500
Named qualifiers
cheese-filled

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Chiles rellenos, filled with meat and cheese

Exact source wording
“Chiles rellenos, filled with meat and cheese”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2710044 · FNDDS 75410530
Named qualifiers
filled with meat and cheese
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef as ingredient in recipes

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “cheese-filled”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordChiles rellenos, cheese-filled 143 g326 kcal 228 kcal 7.8 g 17.2 g 0.7 g 445 mg
Chiles rellenos, filled with meat and cheese 143 g329 kcal 230 kcal 9 g 17.2 g 0.7 g 421 mg
Pupusa, cheese only 100 g256 kcal 256 kcal 11.7 g 13.2 g 2.9 g 400 mg
Taquito, cheese only 70 g216 kcal 309 kcal 11.2 g 15.3 g 3.3 g 632 mg
Quesadilla, cheese only 60 g190 kcal 316 kcal 13.4 g 16.2 g 2 g 676 mg
Gordita, cheese only 125 g405 kcal 324 kcal 10.6 g 21.6 g 1.7 g 490 mg

How to compare FDC 2710043: its source amount is 143 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2710043, the 2 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 chili

326 kcal

143 g

1 cup

401 kcal

176 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2710043, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin C

57.1 mg≈ 63% Daily Value

Saturated fat

8.7 g≈ 44% Daily Value

Total fat

24.6 g≈ 32% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2710043’s 143 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2710043 at 143 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 636 mg sodium, about 28% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 143 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 326 kcal Not established
Protein 11.2 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 14.9 g 5%
Total fat 24.6 g 32%
Dietary fiber 1 g 4%
Sugars 2.1 g Not established
Sodium 636.4 mg 28%
Saturated fat 8.7 g 44%
Monounsaturated Fat 7.8 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 5.2 g Not established
Cholesterol 42.9 mg 14%
Potassium 170.2 mg 4%
Calcium 290.3 mg 22%
Iron 1 mg 5%
Magnesium 21.5 mg 5%
Vitamin C 57.1 mg 63%
Vitamin D 0.1 µg 1%
Vitamin A 101.5 µg 11%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 89.7 g Not established

For FDC 2710043, approximate percentages divide the displayed 143 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2710043 to 5 source inputs totaling 593 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

5 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, Cheese and Queso as ingredient, Breading or batter as ingredient in food. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

593 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Green pepper, cooked, as ingredientUSDA ingredient 99997520 · encyclopedia page available 260 GM 260 g 43.8%
2 Breading or batter as ingredient in foodUSDA ingredient 99995000 · encyclopedia page available 110 GM 110 g 18.5%
3 Cheese and Queso as ingredientUSDA ingredient 99991410 · encyclopedia page available 170 GM 170 g 28.7%
4 Vegetable oil, NFSUSDA ingredient 82101000 · encyclopedia page available 50 GM 50 g 8.4%
5 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 3 GM 3 g 0.5%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2710043, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other Mexican mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories228 kcal230 kcal−2 kcal
Protein7.8 g9 g−1.2 g
Carbohydrate10.4 g9.7 g+0.7 g
Total fat17.2 g17.2 gSame listed value
Dietary fiber0.7 g0.7 gSame listed value
Sodium445 mg421 mg+24 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 1.2 g less protein than “Chiles rellenos, filled with meat and cheese.”

Only the comparison record lists Beef as ingredient in recipes. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

1 of the six displayed differences clears the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient; Breading or batter as ingredient in food; Cheese and Queso as ingredient; Vegetable oil, NFS; and 1 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Beef as ingredient in recipes.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 143 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 chili (143 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 143 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 chili (143 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2710043 with FDC 2710044 at equal mass; use their 143 g and 143 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2710043 versus FDC 2710044 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full other mexican mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2710043 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 228 kcal per 100 g becomes 326 kcal at 143 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 chili has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2710043

FNDDS food code: 75410500

The scaling for FDC 2710043 can be exact while the match to “Chiles rellenos, cheese-filled” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 143 g weight, 5-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.