USDA ingredient referenceUpdated August 22, 2026

Catsup in 10 Feast-indexed USDA foods

Within Feast’s 3,850-record USDA FNDDS reference corpus, “Catsup” appears as a formulation input in 10 finished-food records. Their calories and nutrients describe those complete foods, not the input label by itself. Use the catalog to choose the closest finished food and open its exact FoodData Central citation.

Browse all 10 linked food records →

Exact nutrition reference, complete food catalog and source methodology

This page helps you find complete foods that include Catsup in USDA’s nutrition data. Choose the record that most closely matches what you ate; Feast does not turn a collection average into a standalone ingredient estimate.

What the code means

One exact source label across 10 complete records.

Every occurrence collected here uses ingredient code 11935 and the source description “Catsup.” The code is preserved exactly as it appears in the FNDDS input-food rows. It is not a FoodData Central FDC ID, so this page does not invent a standalone ingredient-record URL.

The strongest concentrations of linked records are currently Burgers (3), Stir-fry and soy-based sauce mixtures (3), Deli and cured meat sandwiches (1). These are category counts within Feast’s selected 3,850-record corpus. They do not estimate how often the ingredient is eaten, how common it is in recipes generally, or its prevalence across every FNDDS release.

Collection-level interpretation

Grounded ways to understand this source label

These summaries describe the linked FNDDS records in this exact corpus. They do not estimate consumer frequency, market share, or the composition of a meal.

Typical listed-weight range

3.1%–10.8%

The middle half of linked records spans 7.6 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.

Largest linked category

Burgers

3 of 10 linked records (30%) sit in this USDA category. The remainder span 5 other categories.

Most populated share band

1% to under 5%

7 records (70%) fall in this band after repeated rows for code 11935 are combined within each food.

Most frequent eligible co-input

Salt, table

It appears alongside code 11935 in 4 linked records (40%). Co-occurrence describes database structure, not a required recipe.

Where USDA uses this input

Linked records by source-food category

Each record is counted once even if ingredient code 11935 appears on more than one input row inside that formulation. The category grouping describes the complete linked foods, not a culinary rule about the ingredient.

USDA survey-food categories

Source-formulation evidence

How the share of listed input weight changes

Repeated rows for code 11935 inside one food are combined before the percentage is calculated. The denominator is the sum of all positive-weight inputs listed for that USDA formulation.

All linked records, not just the extremes

Where the listed-weight shares fall

Each bar counts complete food records after repeated rows for ingredient code 11935 have been combined.

Under 1%0 records
0 of 10
1% to under 5%7 records
7 of 10
5% to under 15%2 records
2 of 10
15% to under 30%0 records
0 of 10
30% to under 60%1 record
1 of 10
60% to 100%0 records
0 of 10

The role changes by food type

Median listed share in the largest USDA categories

Category medians summarize source-formulation shares, not nutrient content or consumption frequency.

Listed-weight share distribution across the largest complete-food categories
Complete-food category	Records	Median	Middle 50%	Observed span
Burgers	3	4.1%	3.5%–4.4%	2.8%–4.7%
Stir-fry and soy-based sauce mixtures	3	3.1%	2.9%–3.1%	2.6%–3.1%

What the spread can tell you

In this collection, “Catsup” ranges from 2.6% to 50% of listed source-input weight, with a median of 4.4%. That variation can help distinguish a food where the input is a small supporting component from a record where it makes up much more of the standardized source formulation.

The spread remains descriptive. It does not show uncertainty around a single recipe, and a high source-weight share does not automatically mean the food supplies more of any particular nutrient. To compare nutrients, use the complete linked records below.

Important nutrition boundary

This collection does not support a verified standalone nutrition answer for “Catsup.”

No unique exact food-code match or reviewed sole-source bridge qualifies for a direct consumer answer. Feast therefore does not treat the collection median, minimum, maximum, or an arbitrary similar record as the nutrition of this input.

The table below describes the complete linked foods per 100 grams. Use it to find a closer finished-food record, not to infer what this formulation input supplies on its own.

Compare complete food records

Nutrient span across the linked foods

Every value in this table describes an entire USDA survey-food record per 100 grams. The values are not the nutrient content of ingredient code 11935, and differences cannot be attributed to this one input.

Nutrient span across complete food records linked to this source ingredient code
Whole-record nutrient	Observed minimum	Middle 50%	Median	Observed maximum	Linked records
Caloriesper 100 g of the complete food	109 kcal	176–262 kcal	214 kcal	278 kcal	10
Proteinper 100 g of the complete food	1.1 g	8.5–13.1 g	9.9 g	16.3 g	10
Carbohydrateper 100 g of the complete food	8.8 g	16.3–26.8 g	20.3 g	28.7 g	10
Total fatper 100 g of the complete food	0.3 g	6.8–12.7 g	9.7 g	15.7 g	10
Dietary fiberper 100 g of the complete food	0.3 g	0.6–1.1 g	0.9 g	1.3 g	10
Sodiumper 100 g of the complete food	261 mg	346–521 mg	447 mg	928 mg	10

The minimum and maximum preserve the complete observed span. The median is the middle linked-record value, not a prediction for a meal and not an ingredient-specific nutrient estimate.

Complete linked catalog

All 10 Feast-indexed food records that list code 11935

This is the complete qualifying-corpus catalog, not a hand-picked sample. Search by food name or USDA category, then open a profile for household portions, Feast’s 21-nutrient panel, formulation details, and its exact FDC citation.

Filter linked records

10 records shown

Complete USDA food-record catalog linked to this source ingredient code
Linked USDA food record	USDA category	Formulation	Listed input weight	Weight share	Calories	Protein	Sodium	Citation
Beef with sweet and sour sauce	Stir-fry and soy-based sauce mixtures	15 input rows	34 g	3.1%	211 kcal	9.3 g	346 mg	FDC 2706392 ↗
Cheeseburger (Burger King)	Burgers	6 input rows	5 g	4.1%	265 kcal	14 g	527 mg	FDC 2706890 ↗
Double cheeseburger (Burger King)	Burgers	6 input rows	5 g	2.8%	278 kcal	16.3 g	502 mg	FDC 2706913 ↗
Hamburger (Burger King)	Burgers	5 input rows	5 g	4.7%	254 kcal	13.6 g	400 mg	FDC 2706922 ↗
Ketchup	Tomato-based condiments	2 input rows	50 g	50%	109 kcal	1.1 g	928 mg	FDC 2709733 ↗
Meatloaf sandwich	Meat and BBQ sandwiches	3 input rows	17 g	12.8%	217 kcal	11.8 g	494 mg	FDC 2706946 ↗
Spam sandwich	Deli and cured meat sandwiches	3 input rows	17 g	12.8%	266 kcal	10 g	913 mg	FDC 2707055 ↗
Stuffed cabbage rolls with beef and rice	Meat mixed dishes	11 input rows	68 g	4.8%	114 kcal	8.3 g	338 mg	FDC 2706620 ↗
Sweet and sour pork with rice	Stir-fry and soy-based sauce mixtures	16 input rows	34 g	2.6%	187 kcal	9.8 g	261 mg	FDC 2706655 ↗
Sweet and sour shrimp	Stir-fry and soy-based sauce mixtures	15 input rows	34 g	3.1%	172 kcal	5.9 g	347 mg	FDC 2706456 ↗

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 9 exact records behind Catsup (USDA input 11935). Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Double cheeseburger (Burger King) is higher in vitamin D per 100 g

Double cheeseburger (Burger King) reports 1.2 µg versus 0 µg for Ketchup: a 1.2 µg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Cheeseburger (Burger King) is denser; Sweet and sour pork with rice is higher in its source amount

Cheeseburger (Burger King) reports 265 kcal per 100 g and 292 kcal in USDA source amount (110 g). Sweet and sour pork with rice reports a lower 187 kcal per 100 g but a higher 456 kcal in USDA source amount (244 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Cheeseburger (Burger King)” from “Sweet and sour pork with rice”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Catsup (USDA input 11935), each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Ketchup

Ketchup is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Sugars, granulated

USDA input 19335 appears in 4 of 9 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 4.2–50 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, water, tap, municipal

USDA input 14429 appears in 3 of 9 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 59.3–59.3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 3 context records in this source topic Stir-fry and soy-based sauce mixtures

Sweet and sour shrimp and Beef with sweet and sour sauce belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Ketchup vs Ketchup, reduced sodium

Ketchup is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Sodium wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus reduced- or low-sodium wording; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Vitamin D: density and serving context

In this page’s records, vitamin D runs from 0 µg in Ketchup to 1.2 µg in Double cheeseburger (Burger King), all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 14 mg in Ketchup to 231 mg in Double cheeseburger (Burger King), all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path

Method and provenance

How this ingredient-centered page was calculated

Feast begins with its pinned 3,850-record USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods reference corpus for FNDDS 2021–2023. Each exact food profile retains its FDC identifier, source-food description, nutrient values, household measures, and positive-weight input-food rows. This page groups those input rows by the exact ingredient code 11935; it does not merge similar-looking ingredient names or infer synonyms.

The distinct-record count deduplicates by FDC food record. When the same code is listed more than once inside one source formulation, its input weights are added before the listed-weight share is calculated. Category counts also count each food once. The 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile use the sorted one-share-per-food values with linear interpolation between adjacent ranks when a percentile falls between two records.

USDA’s current FNDDS documentation explains that many nutrient profiles are generated with calculation recipes designed to represent multiple variants, and that their input codes are not necessarily the exact ingredients in a retail product or an ingredient declaration. It also documents moisture and nutrient-retention adjustments. Feast therefore treats these rows as transparent source-calculation evidence—not as a reverse-engineered recipe.

The complete-food nutrient table uses each linked record’s available published per-100-gram values so the denominator remains consistent; its middle-50% ranges use the same interpolated percentile method. It is presented for record selection and comparison only. No nutrient value is reassigned to the ingredient, no causal effect is inferred, and no “healthy” score is manufactured from the collection.

How to apply the evidence to a meal

Use the ingredient as a discovery clue. Compare the linked record names, food categories, preparation wording, source formulation, and portion measures. If a close record exists, its complete profile can provide a defensible reference estimate. If the meal differs materially in cooking fat, sauce, ingredient ratios, or portion size, keep looking or use recipe weights, a package label, or an editable photo estimate instead.

These pages are educational source indexes. They do not provide medical advice, personalized nutrient targets, food-safety guidance, or a recipe. If a clinician has given you individualized dietary instructions, follow that guidance and use the most specific current source available for the food you actually consumed.