1 medium breast (120 g) of chicken breast, grilled without sauce, skin removed has about 211 calories. Choose your preparation and adjust the amount below.
Portion calculator
Estimate your portion
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 medium breast · 120 g
211calories
Chicken breast, grilled without sauce, skin not eaten
Protein
35.5 g
Carbs
0 g
Fat
6.5 g
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
Choose the cooked chicken preparation you ate, including skin, coating, and sauce, then enter the edible cooked weight. One chicken breast is not a fixed amount.
A worked portion example
A 120 g cooked chicken breast portion
Illustrative calculation: 1 medium breast weighs 120 g using the linked record's portion weight. At 176 calories per 100 g, 120 × 176 ÷ 100 = about 211 calories and 35.5 g protein. This is the grilled-without-sauce, skin-not-eaten example. Use your actual cooked weight and preparation when they differ.
The selected grilled, skin-not-eaten example lists small, medium, and large breasts as 105, 120, and 135 g. If yours differs, use grams. Exclude bones and skin you leave behind. Wording such as 'from raw' in a roasted record describes how it was prepared; it does not turn the finished-food entry into a raw weight.
The selected grilled-without-sauce example includes oil among its ingredients. Other entries distinguish skin eaten, coating eaten, and sauce. If you know the amount of oil or marinade in your own batch, a recipe calculation can represent it more specifically than a broad prepared-food example.
If you weigh the raw chicken for meal prep, use matching raw-ingredient nutrition plus the other recipe ingredients. Divide the finished recipe across the cooked portions by weight. Do not multiply a raw weight by this cooked chicken's per-100-g values.
Editorial update: . Portion examples are calculations from the linked USDA records.
Compare all 27 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources
The 27 exact records in this guide report 173–478 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 144–273 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Across all 27 named USDA examples, a cup, cooked, diced contains 194–369 calories. Their listed weights span 135–165 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.
Match my meal
Start with the description closest to what you ate
For Chicken breast, begin by separating “Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant” from “Chicken breast, stewed, skin not eaten.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Five rank landmarks are shown from all 27 cited records: minimum, 25th-ranked, median-ranked, 75th-ranked, and maximum. Weight is held at 100 grams; source-serving weights are listed in the table.
This guide keeps 27 named USDA records in view: 27 direct matches. All sit within “Chicken, whole pieces.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 27 records together under the exact grouping key “chicken breast.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Chicken breast, this page can compare 27 named records from FDC 2705959 through FDC 2705966. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
120–175 g before composition
The largest source amount is 1.5× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.
Composition
129 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints
The lower endpoint is “baked or broiled, skin not eaten, from pre-cooked”; the higher is “fried, …, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
250 mg sodium gap per 100 g
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from raw” (299 mg) and “Chicken breast, … food / restaurant · FDC 2705978” (549 mg).
Observed source examples
Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints
The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every chicken breast.
Important: “Lower” begins with Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin not eaten, from pre-cooked; “higher” ends with Chicken breast, fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every chicken breast meal.
Full comparison
Compare every selected FNDDS record
For Chicken breast, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
USDA records selected for the Chicken breast nutrition guide
Serving total and calorie density answer different questions
The listed source amounts run from 120 to 175 grams—a 55-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 173 calories for “baked or broiled, skin not eaten, from pre-cooked” to 478 for “fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant.” At a fixed 100 grams, “baked or broiled, skin not eaten, from pre-cooked” is 144 calories and “fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant” is 273—a fixed-weight separation of 129 calories. For Chicken breast, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The long description carries the evidence
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant”, “baked, broiled, or roasted, skin not eaten, from raw”, “fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from raw”, “grilled without sauce, skin not eaten”, and “stewed, skin not eaten”. The source formulations contain 13 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include vegetable oil, nfs, chicken breast, baked, broiled, or roasted, skin not eaten, from raw, chicken breast, baked, broiled, or roasted, skin eaten, from raw, and salt, table. On this Chicken breast page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record
The family label “Chicken breast” cannot resolve the differences between Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant and Chicken breast, stewed, skin not eaten. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
01
Source weight before serving calories
The source amounts span 120–175 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.
02
The words that split the family
Representative record-level distinctions include “baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant”, “baked, broiled, or roasted, skin not eaten, from raw”, “fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from raw”, “grilled without sauce, skin not eaten”, and “stewed, skin not eaten”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
03
Formulation evidence, with limits
13 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.
04
The unresolved plate
Even “Chicken breast, …, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Chicken breast unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Match identity first; scale quantity second
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that chicken breast is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant”, “baked, coated, skin / coating not eaten”, “grilled with sauce, skin eaten”, and “stewed, skin not eaten”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
A practical matching checklist
Read the complete Chicken breast source description, including preparation and additions.
Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.
Explore this meal family
3 more-specific chicken breast guides
Use a focused guide when its description matches your meal. Each one keeps its own exact source records and links back to this broader family.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
Turn source data into a better next decision
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 27 exact records behind Chicken breast source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Chicken breast, fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant is higher in carbohydrate per 100 g
Chicken breast, fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant reports 10.7 g versus 0 g for Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant: a 10.7 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant is denser; Chicken breast, grilled with sauce, skin eaten is higher in its source amount
Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin eaten, from fast food / restaurant reports 206 kcal per 100 g and 268 kcal in USDA source amount (130 g). Chicken breast, grilled with sauce, skin eaten reports a lower 202 kcal per 100 g but a higher 354 kcal in USDA source amount (175 g).
Choose the record before reading the number
Chicken breast, baked or broiled, skin not eaten, from fast food / restaurant and Chicken breast, fried, coated, skin / coating eaten, from fast food / restaurant are not interchangeable
The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Preparation wording (baked, roasted, or broiled versus fried) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.
Follow the relationship that matches your question
For Chicken breast source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.