Mixed disheshigher variability

Pork with chili and tomatoes calories: 168 per 177 g

This exact USDA record reports 168 calories for 177 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 177 g

Calories
168 kcal
Protein
20.5 g
Carbohydrate
4.7 g
Total fat
7.1 g
Fiber
1.6 g
Sodium
209 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 177 g

168calories

Pork with chili and tomatoes

Protein
20.5 g
Carbs
4.7 g
Fat
7.1 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706411

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 168 calories for USDA reference amount at 177 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 95 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 20.5 g protein, 1.6 g fiber, and 209 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw, representing 49.5% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 7 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 168–224 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706411: “Pork with chili and tomatoes.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706411, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 132.8 g 126 kcal 15.4 g 1.2 g 157 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 177 g 168 kcal 20.5 g 1.6 g 209 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 236 g 224 kcal 27.4 g 2.1 g 278 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2706411’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

95 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

11.6 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

0.9 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

118 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706411’s 177 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C30 mg

≈ 33% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Potassium572 mg

≈ 12% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat2.5 g

≈ 12% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium209 mg

≈ 9% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Pork with chili and tomatoes,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706483 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 177 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 132.8–221.3 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 126 kcal and 210 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706483

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 11.7 g less carbohydrate than “Chili with macaroni.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw

    The source formulation has 7 input rows; Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw supplies 49.5% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Pork with chili and tomatoes” fits. Inspect FDC 2706483 when the exact wording “Chili with macaroni” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Pork with chili and tomatoes

Exact source wording
“Pork with chili and tomatoes”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706411 · FNDDS 27121000
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw · Lard · Onions, raw

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Chili with macaroni

Exact source wording
“Chili with macaroni”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706483 · FNDDS 27212120
Source inputs unique in this pair
Chili with meat and beans · Pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordPork with chili and tomatoes 177 g168 kcal 95 kcal 11.6 g 4 g 0.9 g 118 mg
Stew, pork 255 g278 kcal 109 kcal 8.4 g 5.4 g 1.3 g 304 mg
Guisada, pork 255 g301 kcal 118 kcal 10.3 g 7.1 g 0.5 g 300 mg
Chili with macaroni 255 g321 kcal 126 kcal 9 g 3.7 g 2.8 g 311 mg
Chili with meat 255 g354 kcal 139 kcal 13.3 g 8.2 g 0.5 g 357 mg
Chili with meat, canned 255 g270 kcal 106 kcal 8.5 g 3.4 g 3.2 g 357 mg
Chili with meat and beans 255 g301 kcal 118 kcal 9.8 g 4.3 g 3 g 340 mg

How to compare FDC 2706411: its source amount is 177 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706411, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

224 kcal

236 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706411, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin C

29.6 mg≈ 33% Daily Value

Cholesterol

56.6 mg≈ 19% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706411’s 177 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706411 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 20.5 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 177 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 168 kcal Not established
Protein 20.5 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 4.7 g 2%
Total fat 7.1 g 9%
Dietary fiber 1.6 g 6%
Sugars 2.9 g Not established
Sodium 208.9 mg 9%
Saturated fat 2.5 g 12%
Monounsaturated Fat 3.1 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.8 g Not established
Cholesterol 56.6 mg 19%
Potassium 571.7 mg 12%
Calcium 26.6 mg 2%
Iron 1 mg 6%
Magnesium 31.9 mg 8%
Vitamin C 29.6 mg 33%
Vitamin D 0.5 µg 3%
Vitamin A 37.2 µg 4%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 143 g Not established

For FDC 2706411, approximate percentages divide the displayed 177 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706411 to 7 source inputs totaling 1,375.1 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Pork with chili and tomatoes” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

7 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw, Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average, Peppers, jalapeno, raw. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

1,375.1 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, rawUSDA ingredient 10024 1.5 LB 680.4 g 49.5%
2 LardUSDA ingredient 4002 · encyclopedia page available 1 TB 12 g 0.9%
3 Onions, rawUSDA ingredient 11282 · encyclopedia page available 75 GM 75 g 5.5%
4 Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round averageUSDA ingredient 11529 · encyclopedia page available 1 LB 453.6 g 33%
5 Peppers, jalapeno, rawUSDA ingredient 11979 · encyclopedia page available 150 GM 150 g 10.9%
6 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.5 TS 3 g 0.2%
7 Spices, pepper, blackUSDA ingredient 2030 · encyclopedia page available 0.5 TS 1.1 g 0.1%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706411, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories95 kcal126 kcal−31 kcal
Protein11.6 g9 g+2.6 g
Carbohydrate2.7 g14.4 g−11.7 g
Total fat4 g3.7 g+0.3 g
Dietary fiber0.9 g2.8 g−1.9 g
Sodium118 mg311 mg−193 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 31 less calories, 2.6 g more protein, and 11.7 g less carbohydrate than “Chili with macaroni.”

Only this record lists Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw; Lard; Onions, raw; Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average. Only the comparison record lists Chili with meat and beans; Pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Salt, table.

Listed only in this record: Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, raw; Lard; Onions, raw; Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average; and 2 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Chili with meat and beans; Pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 177 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (236 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706411 with FDC 2706483 at equal mass; use their 177 g and 255 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706411 versus FDC 2706483 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Pork with chili and tomatoes,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706411 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 95 kcal per 100 g becomes 168 kcal at 177 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706411

FNDDS food code: 27121000

The scaling for FDC 2706411 can be exact while the match to “Pork with chili and tomatoes” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 177 g weight, 7-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.