Mixed disheshigher variability

Chili with meat calories: 354 per 1 cup (255 g)

This exact USDA record reports 354 calories for 1 cup (255 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 cup · 255 g

Calories
354 kcal
Protein
33.9 g
Carbohydrate
6.1 g
Total fat
21 g
Fiber
1.3 g
Sodium
910 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 255 g

354calories

Chili with meat

Protein
33.9 g
Carbs
6.1 g
Fat
21 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706377

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 354 calories for 1 cup at 255 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 139 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 33.9 g protein, 1.3 g fiber, and 910 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beef as ingredient in recipes, representing 49.1% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 8 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 cup at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706377: “Chili with meat.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706377, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 191.3 g 266 kcal 25.4 g 1 g 683 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 255 g 354 kcal 33.9 g 1.3 g 910 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 318.8 g 443 kcal 42.4 g 1.6 g 1,138 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2706377’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

139 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

13.3 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

lower quarter

0.5 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

357 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706377’s 255 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron4 mg

≈ 21% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin C15 mg

≈ 17% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat8.1 g

≈ 40% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium910 mg

≈ 40% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Chili with meat,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706375 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 255 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 191.3–318.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 266 kcal and 443 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706375

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 2.5 g less dietary fiber than “Chili with meat and beans.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Beef as ingredient in recipes

    The source formulation has 8 input rows; Beef as ingredient in recipes supplies 49.1% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Chili with meat” fits. Inspect FDC 2706375 when the exact wording “Chili with meat and beans” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Chili with meat

Exact source wording
“Chili with meat”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706377 · FNDDS 27111420

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Chili with meat and beans

Exact source wording
“Chili with meat and beans”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706375 · FNDDS 27111406
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beans, kidney, red, mature seeds, cooked, boiled, without salt

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordChili with meat 255 g354 kcal 139 kcal 13.3 g 8.2 g 0.5 g 357 mg
Chili with meat, from restaurant 255 g408 kcal 160 kcal 12 g 9.4 g 1.9 g 413 mg
Chili with meat and beans 255 g301 kcal 118 kcal 9.8 g 4.3 g 3 g 340 mg
Chili with meat, canned 255 g270 kcal 106 kcal 8.5 g 3.4 g 3.2 g 357 mg
Chili with macaroni 255 g321 kcal 126 kcal 9 g 3.7 g 2.8 g 311 mg
Eggplant and meat casserole 152 g146 kcal 96 kcal 7.1 g 5.5 g 1.5 g 176 mg
Pork with chili and tomatoes 177 g168 kcal 95 kcal 11.6 g 4 g 0.9 g 118 mg

How to compare FDC 2706377: its source amount is 255 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706377, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

354 kcal

255 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706377, Saturated fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Saturated fat

8.1 g≈ 40% Daily Value

Sodium

910.4 mg≈ 40% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706377’s 255 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706377 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 33.9 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2706377 at 255 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 910 mg sodium, about 40% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 255 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 354 kcal Not established
Protein 33.9 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 6.1 g 2%
Total fat 21 g 27%
Dietary fiber 1.3 g 5%
Sugars 3.5 g Not established
Sodium 910.4 mg 40%
Saturated fat 8.1 g 40%
Monounsaturated Fat 9.3 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.8 g Not established
Cholesterol 112.2 mg 37%
Potassium 566.1 mg 12%
Calcium 40.8 mg 3%
Iron 3.9 mg 21%
Magnesium 35.7 mg 9%
Vitamin C 15 mg 17%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 30.6 µg 3%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 190.5 g Not established

For FDC 2706377, approximate percentages divide the displayed 255 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706377 to 8 source inputs totaling 101.8 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Chili with meat” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

8 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beef as ingredient in recipes, Beverages, water, tap, drinking, Tomato products, canned, puree, without salt added. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

101.8 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Tomato products, canned, puree, without salt addedUSDA ingredient 11547 · encyclopedia page available 10 GM 10 g 9.8%
2 Onions, cooked, as ingredientUSDA ingredient 99997510 · encyclopedia page available 5 GM 5 g 4.9%
3 Green pepper, cooked, as ingredientUSDA ingredient 99997520 · encyclopedia page available 5 GM 5 g 4.9%
4 Spices, chili powderUSDA ingredient 2009 · encyclopedia page available 0.5 GM 0.5 g 0.5%
5 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.8 GM 0.8 g 0.8%
6 Sugars, granulatedUSDA ingredient 19335 · encyclopedia page available 0.5 GM 0.5 g 0.5%
7 Beef as ingredient in recipesUSDA ingredient 99992100 · encyclopedia page available 50 GM 50 g 49.1%
8 Beverages, water, tap, drinkingUSDA ingredient 14411 · encyclopedia page available 30 GM 30 g 29.5%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706377, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories139 kcal118 kcal+21 kcal
Protein13.3 g9.8 g+3.5 g
Carbohydrate2.4 g10.2 g−7.8 g
Total fat8.2 g4.3 g+3.9 g
Dietary fiber0.5 g3 g−2.5 g
Sodium357 mg340 mg+17 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 21 more calories, 3.5 g more protein, and 7.8 g less carbohydrate than “Chili with meat and beans.”

Only the comparison record lists Beans, kidney, red, mature seeds, cooked, boiled, without salt. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Tomato products, canned, puree, without salt added; Onions, cooked, as ingredient; Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient; Spices, chili powder; and 4 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Beans, kidney, red, mature seeds, cooked, boiled, without salt.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 255 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (255 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706377 with FDC 2706375 at equal mass; use their 255 g and 255 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706377 versus FDC 2706375 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2706377 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Chili with meat,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706377 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 139 kcal per 100 g becomes 354 kcal at 255 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 cup has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706377

FNDDS food code: 27111420

The scaling for FDC 2706377 can be exact while the match to “Chili with meat” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 255 g weight, 8-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.