Energy
middle half110 kcalthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 117 kcal
- Middle 50%
- 106–138 kcal
Based on 99 records reporting energy.
This exact USDA record reports 138 calories for 125 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.
Quick facts
USDA reference amount · 125 g
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 125 g
138calories
Rice dressing
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
The editorial read
Portion: the cited record reports about 138 calories for USDA reference amount at 125 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 110 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.
Composition: that source amount also reports 2.5 g protein, 0.8 g fiber, and 750 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.
Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beverages, water, tap, municipal, representing 60.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 8 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.
The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.
The household measures attached to this record span roughly 138–184 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.
Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.
Record-specific decision brief
This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709089: “Rice dressing.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.
01 · Portion arithmetic
For FDC 2709089, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.
| Scenario | Weight | Energy | Protein | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 93.8 g | 103 kcal | 1.9 g | 0.6 g | 563 mg |
| USDA reference amountExact record reference weight | 125 g | 138 kcal | 2.5 g | 0.8 g | 750 mg |
| 1 cupUSDA-listed household measure | 167 g | 184 kcal | 3.3 g | 1 g | 1,002 mg |
02 · Fixed-weight context
The comparison set contains 99 exact records in the Rice mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2709089’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.
Energy
middle half110 kcalthis record per 100 g
Based on 99 records reporting energy.
Protein
lower quarter2 gthis record per 100 g
Based on 99 records reporting protein.
Dietary fiber
lower quarter0.6 gthis record per 100 g
Based on 99 records reporting dietary fiber.
Sodium
upper quarter600 mgthis record per 100 g
Based on 99 records reporting sodium.
03 · FDA label lens
At FDC 2709089’s 125 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.
Iron1 mg
≈ 6% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Sodium750 mg
≈ 33% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Saturated fat0.8 g
≈ 4% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
04 · Highest-impact checks
For “Rice dressing,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709078 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.
A 25% weight move in either direction spans 93.8–156.3 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 103 kcal and 172 kcal.
At an equal 100 g, this record has 3.1 g less protein than “Dirty rice.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.
The source formulation has 8 input rows; Beverages, water, tap, municipal supplies 60.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.
05 · Exact-record choice
Keep this record when the exact wording “Rice dressing” fits. Inspect FDC 2709078 when the exact wording “Dirty rice” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.
Keep this profile when these fields fit
Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better
Choose the closest description
Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.
On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact record | Source serving | Calories / 100 g | Protein / 100 g | Fat / 100 g | Fiber / 100 g | Sodium / 100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This recordRice dressing | 125 g138 kcal | 110 kcal | 2 g | 3.3 g | 0.6 g | 600 mg |
| Dirty rice | 148 g166 kcal | 112 kcal | 5.1 g | 2.3 g | 0.6 g | 316 mg |
| Rice pilaf | 155 g212 kcal | 137 kcal | 3.3 g | 3 g | 0.4 g | 414 mg |
| Rice croquette | 62 g95 kcal | 154 kcal | 3.4 g | 6.6 g | 0.9 g | 416 mg |
| Rice with raisins | 139 g225 kcal | 162 kcal | 2.7 g | 2.6 g | 0.8 g | 447 mg |
| Flavored rice mixture | 164 g208 kcal | 127 kcal | 1.9 g | 4.3 g | 0.4 g | 296 mg |
| Flavored rice, brown and wild | 163 g173 kcal | 106 kcal | 2.7 g | 2.2 g | 1.1 g | 292 mg |
How to compare FDC 2709089: its source amount is 125 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.
Household measures
For FDC 2709089, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.
184 kcal
167 g
At a glance
For FDC 2709089, Sodium is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.
Sodium
750 mg≈ 33% Daily ValueCarbohydrate
22 g≈ 8% Daily ValueIron
1.2 mg≈ 6% Daily ValueThe percentages above apply to FDC 2709089’s 125 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗
Source-serving signals
These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2709089 at 125 g—not a measured or recommended plate.
Nutrition facts
Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 125 g.
| Nutrient | Amount | Approx. % Daily Value |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 138 kcal 110 kcal | Not established Not established |
| Protein | 2.5 g 2 g | Not shown Not shown |
| Carbohydrate | 22 g 17.6 g | 8% 6% |
| Total fat | 4.1 g 3.3 g | 5% 4% |
| Dietary fiber | 0.8 g 0.6 g | 3% 2% |
| Sugars | 0.9 g 0.7 g | Not established Not established |
| Sodium | 750 mg 600 mg | 33% 26% |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g 0.7 g | 4% 3% |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 1.9 g 1.5 g | Not established Not established |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 1.2 g 1 g | Not established Not established |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg 0 mg | 0% 0% |
| Potassium | 73.8 mg 59 mg | 2% 1% |
| Calcium | 23.8 mg 19 mg | 2% 1% |
| Iron | 1.2 mg 0.9 mg | 6% 5% |
| Magnesium | 10 mg 8 mg | 2% 2% |
| Vitamin C | 0.6 mg 0.5 mg | 1% 1% |
| Vitamin D | 0.1 µg 0.1 µg | 1% 1% |
| Vitamin A | 38.8 µg 31 µg | 4% 3% |
| Caffeine | 0 mg 0 mg | Not established Not established |
| Alcohol | 0 g 0 g | Not established Not established |
| Water | 94.3 g 75.4 g | Not established Not established |
For FDC 2709089, approximate percentages divide the displayed 125 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.
Inside the source record
USDA links FDC 2709089 to 8 source inputs totaling 781 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Rice dressing” inspectable beside similarly named records.
How to read this
The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beverages, water, tap, municipal, Rice, white, long-grain, regular, raw, enriched, Celery, raw. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.
781 g total listed input weight across the formulation.
| # | USDA input | Listed amount | Input weight | Share of listed input weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Onions, rawUSDA ingredient 11282 · encyclopedia page available | 40 GM | 40 g | 5.1% |
| 2 | Celery, rawUSDA ingredient 11143 · encyclopedia page available | 0.5 C | 60 g | 7.7% |
| 3 | Margarine, stickUSDA ingredient 81102010 · encyclopedia page available | 2 TB | 28 g | 3.6% |
| 4 | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, raw, enrichedUSDA ingredient 20044 · encyclopedia page available | 0.75 C | 138.8 g | 17.8% |
| 5 | Beverages, water, tap, municipalUSDA ingredient 14429 · encyclopedia page available | 2 C | 474 g | 60.7% |
| 6 | Soup, beef broth or bouillon, powder, dryUSDA ingredient 6075 · encyclopedia page available | 2 | 7.2 g | 0.9% |
| 7 | Bread, crumbs, dry, grated, plainUSDA ingredient 18079 · encyclopedia page available | 0.25 C | 27 g | 3.5% |
| 8 | Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available | 1 TS | 6 g | 0.8% |
Exact-record context
For FDC 2709089, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Rice mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.
This record
Closest inspectable record
| Nutrient | This record | Comparison record | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 110 kcal | 112 kcal | −2 kcal |
| Protein | 2 g | 5.1 g | −3.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 17.6 g | 17.2 g | +0.4 g |
| Total fat | 3.3 g | 2.3 g | +1 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0.6 g | 0.6 g | Same listed value |
| Sodium | 600 mg | 316 mg | +284 mg |
Plain-English read
At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 3.1 g less protein, 1 g more total fat, and 284 mg more sodium than “Dirty rice.”
Only this record lists Celery, raw; Margarine, stick; Beverages, water, tap, municipal; Soup, beef broth or bouillon, powder, dry. Only the comparison record lists Vegetable oil, NFS; Chicken, broilers or fryers, giblets, cooked, simmered; Soup, chicken broth, ready-to-serve; Garlic, raw. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.
3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.
Formulation evidence
The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.
Shared listed inputs: Onions, raw; Rice, white, long-grain, regular, raw, enriched; Salt, table.
Listed only in this record: Celery, raw; Margarine, stick; Beverages, water, tap, municipal; Soup, beef broth or bouillon, powder, dry; and 1 more.
Listed only in the comparison: Vegetable oil, NFS; Chicken, broilers or fryers, giblets, cooked, simmered; Soup, chicken broth, ready-to-serve; Garlic, raw; and 3 more.
Portion evidence
This record’s reference amount is 125 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (167 g).
The comparison record’s reference amount is 148 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (198 g).
Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709089 with FDC 2709078 at equal mass; use their 125 g and 148 g source amounts only for portion matching.
Evidence boundary: FDC 2709089 versus FDC 2709078 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.
Review the full rice mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →
Uncertainty, made actionable
This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, cooked-to-dry ratio, sauce or mix-ins, added fat.
For “Rice dressing,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.
When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.
Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.
Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.
Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.
How we estimated this
FDC 2709089 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 110 kcal per 100 g becomes 138 kcal at 125 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.
About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.
Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024
FoodData Central ID: 2709089
FNDDS food code: 58163510
The scaling for FDC 2709089 can be exact while the match to “Rice dressing” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 125 g weight, 8-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.
Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.