Mixed disheshigher variability

Beef wellington calories: 320 per 87 g

This exact USDA record reports 320 calories for 87 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 87 g

Calories
320 kcal
Protein
16.7 g
Carbohydrate
8.9 g
Total fat
23.8 g
Fiber
0.3 g
Sodium
158 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 87 g

320calories

Beef wellington

Protein
16.7 g
Carbs
8.9 g
Fat
23.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706501

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 320 calories for USDA reference amount at 87 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 368 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 16.7 g protein, 0.3 g fiber, and 158 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted, representing 68.2% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 11 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 slice answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 320–427 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706501: “Beef wellington.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706501, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 slice” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 65.3 g 240 kcal 12.5 g 0.3 g 119 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 87 g 320 kcal 16.7 g 0.3 g 158 mg
1 sliceUSDA-listed household measure 116 g 427 kcal 22.3 g 0.5 g 211 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2706501’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

368 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

19.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

lower quarter

0.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

182 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706501’s 87 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron3 mg

≈ 16% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Potassium238 mg

≈ 5% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat8.3 g

≈ 42% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium158 mg

≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Beef wellington,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706371 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 87 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 65.3–108.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 240 kcal and 400 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706371

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 21.4 g more total fat than “Beef burgundy.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted

    The source formulation has 11 input rows; Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted supplies 68.2% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Beef wellington” fits. Inspect FDC 2706371 when the exact wording “Beef burgundy” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Beef wellington

Exact source wording
“Beef wellington”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706501 · FNDDS 27214300
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted · Margarine, stick · Olive oil

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beef burgundy

Exact source wording
“Beef burgundy”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706371 · FNDDS 27111200
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw · Vegetable oil, NFS · Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBeef wellington 87 g320 kcal 368 kcal 19.2 g 27.4 g 0.4 g 182 mg
Beef salad 136 g355 kcal 261 kcal 17.8 g 19.3 g 0.4 g 338 mg
Beef with gravy 183 g285 kcal 156 kcal 21.6 g 7.1 g 0 g 360 mg
Beef stroganoff 192 g288 kcal 150 kcal 10.1 g 9.3 g 0.7 g 458 mg
Beef burgundy 183 g271 kcal 148 kcal 18.5 g 6 g 0.8 g 369 mg
Guisada, beef 255 g293 kcal 115 kcal 10.8 g 6.6 g 0.5 g 305 mg
Beef curry 240 g271 kcal 113 kcal 7.6 g 6.6 g 1.4 g 359 mg

How to compare FDC 2706501: its source amount is 87 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706501, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 slice

427 kcal

116 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706501, Saturated fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Saturated fat

8.3 g≈ 42% Daily Value

Total fat

23.8 g≈ 31% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706501’s 87 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706501 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 16.7 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 87 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 320 kcal Not established
Protein 16.7 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 8.9 g 3%
Total fat 23.8 g 31%
Dietary fiber 0.3 g 1%
Sugars 0.1 g Not established
Sodium 158.3 mg 7%
Saturated fat 8.3 g 42%
Monounsaturated Fat 10 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 2.6 g Not established
Cholesterol 72.2 mg 24%
Potassium 238.4 mg 5%
Calcium 7.8 mg 1%
Iron 3 mg 16%
Magnesium 18.3 mg 4%
Vitamin C 0.5 mg 1%
Vitamin D 0.3 µg 1%
Vitamin A 13.1 µg 1%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 36.5 g Not established

For FDC 2706501, approximate percentages divide the displayed 87 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706501 to 11 source inputs totaling 2,062.9 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Beef wellington” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

11 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted, Flour, wheat, all-purpose, enriched, bleached, Shortening, vegetable, household, composite. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

2,062.9 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roastedUSDA ingredient 13928 3.1 LB 1,406.2 g 68.2%
2 Mushrooms, rawUSDA ingredient 75115000 · encyclopedia page available 70 GM 70 g 3.4%
3 Onions, rawUSDA ingredient 11282 · encyclopedia page available 10 GM 10 g 0.5%
4 Margarine, stickUSDA ingredient 81102010 · encyclopedia page available 14.1 GM 14.1 g 0.7%
5 Olive oilUSDA ingredient 82104000 · encyclopedia page available 1 TB 14 g 0.7%
6 Parsley, freshUSDA ingredient 11297 · encyclopedia page available 1 TS 1.3 g 0.1%
7 Pate, chicken liver, cannedUSDA ingredient 7053 0.5 C 104 g 5%
8 Flour, wheat, all-purpose, enriched, bleachedUSDA ingredient 20081 · encyclopedia page available 2 C 250 g 12.1%
9 Shortening, vegetable, household, compositeUSDA ingredient 4615 · encyclopedia page available 128 GM 128.1 g 6.2%
10 Beverages, water, tap, drinkingUSDA ingredient 14411 · encyclopedia page available 4 TB 59.3 g 2.9%
11 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 1 TS 6 g 0.3%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706501, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories368 kcal148 kcal+220 kcal
Protein19.2 g18.5 g+0.7 g
Carbohydrate10.2 g4.2 g+6 g
Total fat27.4 g6 g+21.4 g
Dietary fiber0.4 g0.8 g−0.4 g
Sodium182 mg369 mg−187 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 220 more calories, 6 g more carbohydrate, and 21.4 g more total fat than “Beef burgundy.”

Only this record lists Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted; Margarine, stick; Olive oil; Pate, chicken liver, canned. Only the comparison record lists Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw; Vegetable oil, NFS; Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program); Spices, pepper, black. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

4 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Mushrooms, raw; Onions, raw; Parsley, fresh; Flour, wheat, all-purpose, enriched, bleached; and 1 more.

Listed only in this record: Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, prime, cooked, roasted; Margarine, stick; Olive oil; Pate, chicken liver, canned; and 2 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw; Vegetable oil, NFS; Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program); Spices, pepper, black; and 1 more.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 87 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 slice (116 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 183 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (244 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706501 with FDC 2706371 at equal mass; use their 87 g and 183 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706501 versus FDC 2706371 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Beef wellington,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706501 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 368 kcal per 100 g becomes 320 kcal at 87 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706501

FNDDS food code: 27214300

The scaling for FDC 2706501 can be exact while the match to “Beef wellington” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 87 g weight, 11-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.