Typical listed-weight range
6.3%–37.3%
The middle half of linked records spans 31 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Within Feast’s 3,850-record USDA FNDDS reference corpus, “Carrots, mature, raw” appears as a formulation input in 35 finished-food records. Their calories and nutrients describe those complete foods, not the input label by itself. Use the catalog to choose the closest finished food and open its exact FoodData Central citation.
Browse all 35 linked food records →This page helps you find complete foods that include Carrots, mature, raw in USDA’s nutrition data. Choose the record that most closely matches what you ate; Feast does not turn a collection average into a standalone ingredient estimate.
What the code means
Every occurrence collected here uses ingredient code 11124 and the source description “Carrots, mature, raw.” The code is preserved exactly as it appears in the FNDDS input-food rows. It is not a FoodData Central FDC ID, so this page does not invent a standalone ingredient-record URL.
The strongest concentrations of linked records are currently Carrots (5), Lettuce and lettuce salads (5), Poultry mixed dishes (5). These are category counts within Feast’s selected 3,850-record corpus. They do not estimate how often the ingredient is eaten, how common it is in recipes generally, or its prevalence across every FNDDS release.
Collection-level interpretation
These summaries describe the linked FNDDS records in this exact corpus. They do not estimate consumer frequency, market share, or the composition of a meal.
Typical listed-weight range
The middle half of linked records spans 31 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Largest linked category
5 of 35 linked records (14%) sit in this USDA category. The remainder span 13 other categories.
Most populated share band
19 records (54%) fall in this band after repeated rows for code 11124 are combined within each food.
Most frequent eligible co-input
It appears alongside code 11124 in 18 linked records (51%). Co-occurrence describes database structure, not a required recipe.
Where USDA uses this input
Each record is counted once even if ingredient code 11124 appears on more than one input row inside that formulation. The category grouping describes the complete linked foods, not a culinary rule about the ingredient.
Carrots, fresh, cooked with oil; Carrots, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine; Carrots, cooked, from restaurant
Lettuce, salad with cheese, tomato and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressing; Lettuce, salad with avocado, tomato, and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressing; Lettuce, salad with egg, tomato, and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressing
Chicken or turkey, breaded, fried, garden salad with bacon and cheese, chicken and/or turkey, bacon, cheese, lettuce and/or greens, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing; Chicken or turkey garden salad with cheese, chicken and/or turkey, cheese, lettuce and/or greens, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing; Chicken or turkey garden salad with bacon and cheese, chicken and/or turkey, bacon, cheese, lettuce and/or greens, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing
Macaroni or pasta salad, made with creamy dressing; Macaroni or pasta salad, made with light Italian dressing; Macaroni or pasta salad, made with light creamy dressing
Carrots, raw, salad; Carrots, raw, salad with apples; Broccoli slaw salad
Shrimp garden salad, shrimp, lettuce, eggs, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing; Seafood garden salad with seafood, lettuce, eggs, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing; Seafood garden salad with seafood, lettuce, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing
Peas and carrots, fresh, cooked, fat added; Peas and carrots, fresh, cooked, no added fat
Roll with meat and/or shrimp, vegetables and rice paper, not fried
Important nutrition boundary
No unique exact food-code match or reviewed sole-source bridge qualifies for a direct consumer answer. Feast therefore does not treat the collection median, minimum, maximum, or an arbitrary similar record as the nutrition of this input.
The table below describes the complete linked foods per 100 grams. Use it to find a closer finished-food record, not to infer what this formulation input supplies on its own.
Compare complete food records
Every value in this table describes an entire USDA survey-food record per 100 grams. The values are not the nutrient content of ingredient code 11124, and differences cannot be attributed to this one input.
| Whole-record nutrient | Observed minimum | Middle 50% | Median | Observed maximum | Linked records |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caloriesper 100 g of the complete food | 24 kcal | 66–123 kcal | 91 kcal | 374 kcal | 35 |
| Proteinper 100 g of the complete food | 0.9 g | 1.6–6.6 g | 3.8 g | 11 g | 35 |
| Carbohydrateper 100 g of the complete food | 2.8 g | 4.4–17.4 g | 10.2 g | 51.8 g | 35 |
| Total fatper 100 g of the complete food | 0.2 g | 2.1–5.8 g | 3.3 g | 17.5 g | 35 |
| Dietary fiberper 100 g of the complete food | 0.8 g | 1.2–2.5 g | 1.6 g | 4.6 g | 35 |
| Sodiumper 100 g of the complete food | 33 mg | 174–277 mg | 211 mg | 679 mg | 35 |
The minimum and maximum preserve the complete observed span. The median is the middle linked-record value, not a prediction for a meal and not an ingredient-specific nutrient estimate.
Complete linked catalog
This is the complete qualifying-corpus catalog, not a hand-picked sample. Search by food name or USDA category, then open a profile for household portions, Feast’s 21-nutrient panel, formulation details, and its exact FDC citation.
35 records shown
No linked record matches that filter. Clear the search to restore the complete catalog.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 11 exact records behind Carrots, mature, raw (USDA input 11124). Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Carrots, raw, salad reports 15.7 g versus 0.4 g for Carrots, fresh, cooked, no added fat: a 15.3 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThe denominator changes the answer
Carrots, fresh, cooked with oil reports 76 kcal per 100 g and 61 kcal in USDA source amount (80 g). Shrimp garden salad, shrimp, lettuce, eggs, tomato and/or carrots, other vegetables, no dressing reports a lower 65 kcal per 100 g but a higher 159 kcal in USDA source amount (244 g).
Choose the record before reading the number
The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes the exact source description the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Carrots, mature, raw (USDA input 11124), each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Carrots, fresh, cooked with oil and Carrots, fresh, cooked, no added fat are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Best next guide for this exact record LettuceLettuce, salad with cheese, tomato and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressing and Lettuce, salad with egg, cheese, tomato, and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressing are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Compare two records on this page Lettuce, salad with cheese, tomato and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressing vs Lettuce, salad with egg, cheese, tomato, and/or carrots, with or without other vegetables, no dressingBoth records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Calories: 91 versus 71 kcal per 100 g; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Cucumber, with peel, rawUSDA input 11205 appears in 5 of 11 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 10.4–301 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Salt, tableUSDA input 2047 appears in 6 of 11 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 0.3–18 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Carrots, canned, reduced sodium, cooked, no added fat vs Carrots, fresh, cooked, no added fatCarrots, fresh, cooked, no added fat is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: canned versus fresh; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, iron runs from 0.2 mg in Carrots, fresh, cooked with oil to 3.5 mg in Bread, vegetable, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence pathMethod and provenance
Feast begins with its pinned 3,850-record USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods reference corpus for FNDDS 2021–2023. Each exact food profile retains its FDC identifier, source-food description, nutrient values, household measures, and positive-weight input-food rows. This page groups those input rows by the exact ingredient code 11124; it does not merge similar-looking ingredient names or infer synonyms.
The distinct-record count deduplicates by FDC food record. When the same code is listed more than once inside one source formulation, its input weights are added before the listed-weight share is calculated. Category counts also count each food once. The 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile use the sorted one-share-per-food values with linear interpolation between adjacent ranks when a percentile falls between two records.
USDA’s current FNDDS documentation explains that many nutrient profiles are generated with calculation recipes designed to represent multiple variants, and that their input codes are not necessarily the exact ingredients in a retail product or an ingredient declaration. It also documents moisture and nutrient-retention adjustments. Feast therefore treats these rows as transparent source-calculation evidence—not as a reverse-engineered recipe.
The complete-food nutrient table uses each linked record’s available published per-100-gram values so the denominator remains consistent; its middle-50% ranges use the same interpolated percentile method. It is presented for record selection and comparison only. No nutrient value is reassigned to the ingredient, no causal effect is inferred, and no “healthy” score is manufactured from the collection.
Use the ingredient as a discovery clue. Compare the linked record names, food categories, preparation wording, source formulation, and portion measures. If a close record exists, its complete profile can provide a defensible reference estimate. If the meal differs materially in cooking fat, sauce, ingredient ratios, or portion size, keep looking or use recipe weights, a package label, or an editable photo estimate instead.
These pages are educational source indexes. They do not provide medical advice, personalized nutrient targets, food-safety guidance, or a recipe. If a clinician has given you individualized dietary instructions, follow that guidance and use the most specific current source available for the food you actually consumed.